Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: cynwoody
You might want to google for check deposit via camera.

The OP specifically asked if he could deposit a photocopy of the (already deposited) check. Not a photograph, transmitted electronically.

I think we're talking two different things here.

50 posted on 05/30/2017 10:56:02 PM PDT by Windflier (Pitchforks and torches ripen on the vine. Left too long, they become black rifles.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]


To: Windflier
So, since the first bank refused his check, he would have every right to submit it to a second bank, electronically, photograhically, and retroactively, while failing to inform either bank of the retroactivity.

That, of course, raises the question of, if, somehow, the check clears twice. But, in the story, the first bank has rejected the check, so that shouldn't be an issue.

But I would think, physically deposit to B of A, bounced, followed by deposit pic to Wells Fargo, accepted, would be OK. At least as far as banking goes. There remains the matter of the actual designated payees vs the actual title of the destination account.

But photocopies of checks are perfectly acceptable, absent fraud.

51 posted on 05/30/2017 11:18:47 PM PDT by cynwoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson