[brucedickinson]

Full Headline: "Princeton professor calls Trump 'a racist, sexist meglomaniac' during commencement speech at Hampshire College"

Here is the perfesser spitting some sick beatbox. That is one, homely dude.

And here he is, getting some pie.

"Taylor, who is the author of 'From #BlackLivesMatter to Black Liberation', suggested that political activism is the reason why the federal court has struck down Trump's executive orders that restrict immigration from several Muslim-majority countries. "

No, honey, blackslivesmatter didn't stop the travel bans, here is who stopped the travel bans:

Rosa Parks was the secretary of the local chapter of the NAACP when she was taught activism by these guys at the "Highlander Folk School." She was then, surrounded by lawyers, sat on a bus.

The reverend doctor professor Martin Luther the King didn't write the "I have a Dream" speech, although he read it. Here is his communist handler, Stanley Levison. Stanley wrote the speech- that was Stanley's dream. It was because of his relationship with Stanley that the FBI was interested in following and taping the good reverend. The FBI later said the tapes mostly consisted of "animalistic grunts and groans":

And lastly, perfesser, here is the founder of Blacklivesmatter, the guy who writes the checks, a one Mr. George Schwartz, I mean George Soros:

Someone should tell thatProfessor Aiyeenga Moromasta Vajayjay guy to read up on his history.

[rktman]

Hmmmm. Seems to me like the ‘esteemed’ prof should be thankin’ us that he lives here and isn’t being uh, ‘steamed’ somewhere in Africa.

[Pearls Before Swine]

That is one, homely dude.

That is one, homely well fed dude.

[allendale]

All you need to know is that this fool gets paid the same amount as a Professor of Physics. At most universities his salary for his “scholarly activities” is paid by taxpayers.

[jeffc]

...suggested that political activism is the reason why the federal court has struck down Trump's executive orders that restrict immigration...

My take from this is the liberal mask is slipping a little and he/she/it is admitting that political activism of the judges is the reason. And, of course, they are celebrating that....

[Doogle]

....must be an interesting class...she,he,or it
Can’t be found on “Rate My Professor”

[GrandJediMasterYoda]

Another moron making “Professor” synonymous with “idiot”. Seriously, where does it end? A group of 5 year olds have more common sense than these idiots.

This garbage all started in the 1970s when the hippie radicals started replacing the retiring WW2/Korean war era Professors and it’s been a never ending cycle ever since. These radicals indoctrinate the naive students who grow up to be radical teachers and the process repeats - they indoctrinate their students and with what I observed, each new generation becoming even more radical than the last whereas today we have these students and teachers completely and utterly out of their minds.

When I went to College from 1978 to 82, I put Reagan stickers all over my car for the ‘80 election. Nobody said anything and this was in New York city which is just about as left as it gets today. I would imagine today my car would have been utterly destroyed. I had one class on English literature where our Professor would come in every day in a suit and tie and something happened where he got sick and had to retire, and he was replaced by this hippie - I mean THE cliched hippie wearing a tie dye shirt and sandals and a beard - who told us to call him “Josh, man” and right away he went into bashing Reagan and Nixon and I dropped the class right there, same day. This is exactly the reason why our Universities are nothing but mental institutions today. Something has to be done because it is doing TREMENDOUS damage to the country.

[Tai_Chung]

Not one word calling him “controversial”.

Even if it were true, how would it help the graduates succeed in life? The kids need advice, words of wisdom, motivation. They don’t need a bunch of hate speech.

[Grampa Dave]

[a fool in paradise]

Why is she talking about Hitlery’s husband?

[Mr. Douglas]

Exposing a major debate tool of the left:

Projection.

[Neoliberalnot]

Joe Kay gives an excellent account of the Black Lies Matter movement. Black Protests are a Black klan movement:
Campus Transformation. By the late 1980s or early 1990s, the agenda shifted from increasing the number of blacks on campus to transforming the campus to make blacks feel “at home,” and to correct what was seen as overpowering if not debilitating whiteness. “Diversity” was now official orthodoxy, and was implement top to bottom. Universities also increasingly focused on “retention,” so students who once would have flunked out now stayed on and even graduated, thanks to majors such as Black Studies.
Stage Four: The campus, to use a nuclear physics term, goes “critical.” Intensified recruitment had failed to attract qualified black students and faculty, but to meet quotas for non-whites, recruitment for students, faculty, and administrators moved ever farther toward the left side of the bell curve. Whereas earlier blacks on campus might have been challenged by Math 101, today’s recruits are utterly bewildered.
Meanwhile, since it is impossible to recruit enough competent black faculty, the problem is solved by hiring black administrators who understand that their cushy jobs depend on keeping the racial grievance pot boiling. To this end they invent bogus explanations for black academic failure: structural racism, micro-aggressions, white privilege, and stereotype threat. Further pressure for diversity now comes from white students marinated in the “diversity-is-our-strength” dogma.
Consider a typical set of demands: Students at UCLA want $40 million out of the school’s endowment to fund “a comprehensive effort to address the underrepresentation of African-American students, faculty, and staff at our university.” They also want free housing for black students, campus safe spaces, mandatory cultural awareness training for all students, and sundry other accommodations. These demands are in response to innocuous incidents: The white student body president was caught making black gang signs, or someone posted the rap sheet of Freddie Gray, the Baltimore man who died in an arrest gone bad.
At University of Chicago, “students of color” just issued 50 demands, including the usual stuff: free tuitions for illegals, special club houses for blacks, Hispanics, and Asians; and entirely new departments of Black Studies, African Studies, Caribbean Studies, and Asian-American Studies.
What Explains the Protest Mania?
There are two major factors driving these periodic upheavals. The first is the intellectual deficiency of most of today’s black students. The second are the incentives for school administrators to give in.
Blacks would not protest if they were of the same intellectual caliber as whites and Asians. The wider the average gaps, the more frequent the protests, which can be seen as a kind of “self medication.” After weeks of classroom frustration, it is euphoric to take over the president’s office and watch him squirm when you present 25 non-negotiable demands. Thanks to social media, the cost for organizing a protest is about zero, and who can resist the instant camaraderie and media coverage that comes from waving homemade signs and chanting anti-racist slogans?
It is as if these students believed that administrators have special, almost magical powers that can cause dim students to succeed, so obtaining a diploma just requires putting pressure on white functionaries. Tom Wolfe called it Mau-Mauing the flak catchers. This exaggerated view of white capacity harks back to the slogan “Moon and the Ghetto” of the 1960s—if Washington can send a man to the moon, it can fix the inner-city.
The tip-off to the therapeutic, non-rational nature of these demands is that most are impractical, illegal, or academically irrelevant. Can the administration really double the size of the black faculty in only a few months? Do the UCLA protestors really think they can extract $40 million from the state of California? Do innumerate students even know what $40 million is? And how, for example, will protestors benefit from forcing the colleges to raise the wages of campus food workers or from divesting from firms running private prisons? Other demands are punitive, such as asking for demeaning written apologies from the college president.
Campus protestors are unlike professionally run interest groups that have specific goals and negotiate their demands rationally. Protest feeds on itself, like thrill-seekers who must always find new excitement to sustain their high. Demonstrators become adrenalin–driven “protest junkies.”
But why do school administrators tolerate this nonsense? Why not immediately call campus security? Mainly because these demands, no matter how foolish or expensive, personally cost administrators nothing. These are utterly unlike labor union demands, which could bankrupt a firm and cost the CEO his job. No board of trustees warns the school’s president that hiring more black teachers could mean cutting his travel budget. Expenses may be trimmed but they will be invisible—not filling an empty faculty position in the Classics Department.
In the short run the extra money needed for surrender can be raised by increasing tuition, squeezing a few rich donors, or pleading for more government funding. Universities are not competitive businesses for which soaring expenses must be covered by increased revenue. They are more like public utilities that can meet increased costs by charging more for services
Meeting black demands is actually a bonanza any administrator who measures his status by the size of his budget. Building a cultural center, hiring black psychologists and sensitivity counselors, setting up new departments, adding yet more Deans with titles such as Senior Associate Director of Admission for Access and Inclusion (I have not made this up)—all this means larger bureaucratic empires and even salary increases because of new responsibilities. Protestors and administrators often have symbiotic relationships; black agitators never insist that the school slash the president’s entertainment fund to pay for a new black-themed residency hall.
Furthermore, an administrator who immediately caves in to even the most outrageous demands is likely to be applauded for “managing” potentially violent conflict. The solution is always to spend other people’s money, and college administrators are never fired for being wimps. Any hardliner who ordered arrests would be judged inflexible and insensitive to the plight of blacks on today’s white-dominated campuses. “It’s only money,” and what’s money when it comes to giving hope and making amends for past injustices?
Finally, black protestors are the perfect useful idiots for radical administrators. For social justice warriors masquerading as university bureaucrats, having black students advance your agenda—often with the threat of violence—is a godsend. All the campus brouhaha will intimidate those who might resist today’s cultural Marxism. Fans of ideological indoctrination can always blame protestors for the onward march of campus totalitarianism: The protestors forced me!
Can this Go On Forever?
The short answer is “no,” but it can last for some time. It is not easy to stop empire building or self-medication. Eventually—hopefully—pressure will come from outside, from state legislatures, trustees, or donors, all sick of this embarrassing behavior. What happened at the University of Missouri may be a sign of things to come: the university’s total surrender to of protestors caused thousands of parents to enroll their children elsewhere, and tuition revenue fell sharply.
The real source of the problem—unqualified black students—could be quietly eliminated. Tactics might include substituting immigrant or second-generation African or Caribbean blacks for American blacks, who have a weak work ethic and like mindless protests. Administrators could surreptitiously welcome lawsuits against egregious demands, such as “blacks only” housing. Parody might help, too: White students could demand a Department of Hillbilly Studies. Even better, admissions officers might suddenly discover that although recent court decisions permit racial preferences they do not require them.
Black protest will not end until colleges return to the “Campus at Rest” state, in which a small number of black students are admitted on ability rather than to fill quotas. This will not happen until universities recognize that blacks cannot perform at the same level as whites. Every year, college administrators seem ever more determined to deny the obvious. By Joe Kay

[Puppage]

Looks like ReRUn

[CASchack]

Talk about devaluing the currency of a Princeton education...

[tumblindice]

After reading the comments, I’m still confused Bruce.
Is “professor” Hatari female or male? It is so ugly.

[trisham]

https://www.facebook.com/keeangayamahtta.taylor

[eastforker]

Y’all are missing it, that’s not a dude.

The president of the United States, the most powerful politician in the world, is a racist, sexist megalomaniac,’ Taylor said roughly two minutes into her speech.

[BilLies]

“330,000+ WHITE UNION military knowingly left their families and went to their deaths during the Civil War; they gave up their lives to free the BLACK AMERICAN SLAVES, they followed the directives and emancipation orders of their government, a government THEY ELECTED. I have never heard a Progressive African-American, or a White Progressive, ever acknowledge, much less credit these men for their sacrifices, nor do they recognize the 260,000 White+ Union military who were wounded and/or grievously disabled; nor the widows; nor the children, nor the families of the military who also suffered TO FREE THE BLACK SLAVES.”
COMMEMORATE MEMORIAL DAY EVERY DAY AND REMEMBER WHY THE 330,000+ DIED, BECAUSE THE PROFESSIONAL RACISTS IN THE COUNTRY WILL NOT!

[Old Grumpy]

“Keeanga-Yamahtta Taylor”

OF COURSE he thinks Trump is a racist.

[Vaduz]

That’s no professor that’s an idiot with bad eating habits.

[Trillian]

I think there is only one place setting at that table.