Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Tonytitan

EMALS may also allow for more launches per hour verses steam. EMALS also requires a lot more electrical generation (bigger steam driven generators), whereas steam catapults already have a source from the boilers.


15 posted on 05/12/2017 5:33:12 AM PDT by davidb56
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: davidb56

These newer ships (including the USS Zumwalt) are designed to have the excess electrical capacity to run these types of things.


16 posted on 05/12/2017 6:02:52 AM PDT by rlmorel (President Donald J. Trump ... Making Liberal Heads Explode, 140 Characters at a Time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: davidb56

QUESTION:

Why can’t the launch valve open a bit more slowly?
Less stress on the aircraft, etc......?


19 posted on 05/12/2017 6:13:21 AM PDT by Flintlock (The ballot box STOLEN, our soapbox taken away--the BULLET BOX is left to us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: davidb56

EMALS may also allow for more launches per hour verses steam.
**********************************
Not sure what you mean...

Using port and starboard catapults, we were launching an aircraft every 2 minutes (giving adequate time for the previous aircraft to clear the area). Steam pressure was not a problem, time-wise, as the taxiing, hold-back and hook-up took more time.


22 posted on 05/12/2017 6:28:44 AM PDT by octex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson