Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: davidb56

QUESTION:

Why can’t the launch valve open a bit more slowly?
Less stress on the aircraft, etc......?


19 posted on 05/12/2017 6:13:21 AM PDT by Flintlock (The ballot box STOLEN, our soapbox taken away--the BULLET BOX is left to us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: Flintlock

You’d need a longer deck.


24 posted on 05/12/2017 6:45:29 AM PDT by Cvengr ( Adversity in life & death is inevitable; Stress is optional through faith in Christ.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: Flintlock
Why can’t the launch valve open a bit more slowly?
Less stress on the aircraft, etc……?
The mechanism is designed to guarantee that steam pressure adequate to launch the plane exists before the launch is initiated. The result is an abrupt release.

Seems to (naive?) me that it would be possible to have an auxiliary "hold back” mechanism whereby upon initiation of launch, the catapult would be dragging a large additional mass such that the initial acceleration over would be about half as high, but that mass would be detached after the catapult had traveled a foot or two so that the full acceleration capability would be delivered through the remainder of the throw of the catapult.

But you must understand the conservative instincts of someone who designs a machine to thrust a plane - costing many millions of dollars and containing a crew of one or more - to a speed adequate to assure safe takeoff. The failure rate must be very close to zero.


29 posted on 05/12/2017 11:55:45 AM PDT by conservatism_IS_compassion (The idea around which ‘liberalism’ coheres is that NOTHING ACTUALLY MATTERS except PR.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson