Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 04/29/2017 7:40:29 AM PDT by MtnClimber
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last
To: MtnClimber

They’re definitely not HOPEFULLY irrational.


2 posted on 04/29/2017 7:41:41 AM PDT by MuttTheHoople (Yes, Liberals, I question your patriotism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MtnClimber

They are mostly insane though a few are uninformed. The rest are criminal minded.


3 posted on 04/29/2017 7:42:01 AM PDT by MtnClimber (For photos of Colorado scenery and wildlife, click on my screen name for my FR home page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MtnClimber

What passes for liberalism is animal consciousness, the alternative to God consciousness. It is a “lost in sin” condition. Evidence is most obvious in those who curse God and slander Christ. These are demonic influences.


4 posted on 04/29/2017 7:44:37 AM PDT by Louis Foxwell (The Left has the temperament of a squealing pig.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MtnClimber

Yes.


5 posted on 04/29/2017 7:46:26 AM PDT by Excuse_My_Bellicosity (Liberalism is a social disease.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MtnClimber

We may one day find leftist liberal progressives (by their definition) are actually aliens from an alternate universe, a really goofy one, with an entirely different thought process that does not allow them to understand basic common sense or simple logic.

Heck; I’m already convinced.


6 posted on 04/29/2017 7:46:52 AM PDT by Boomer (The MSM and Radicalized Dem Party are One and the SAME!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MtnClimber

Yes. Next topic.


7 posted on 04/29/2017 7:46:52 AM PDT by wastoute (Government cannot redistribute wealth. Government can only redistribute poverty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MtnClimber
Some of the most ardent Conservatives were rabid Liberals at one time. Walter E. Williams, Thomas Sowell, Andrew Breitbart, and David Horowitz come immediately to mind. I'm sure there are many others. It's at least worth a try but I don't spend a whole lot of time trying to convince Libturds how stupid they are.

In this case, I would've aksed the woman, "If you owned an airline, is that how you would run it?"

Regardless of how she answered, I would just say, "Ah", and go back to work.

8 posted on 04/29/2017 7:47:40 AM PDT by Texas Eagle (If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all -- Texas Eagle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MtnClimber
I leave it to you to discern her economic philosophy.

emotionalism + evasion + anti-reality = libtardism

10 posted on 04/29/2017 7:50:36 AM PDT by mjp ((pro-{God, reality, reason, egoism, individualism, natural rights, limited government, capitalism}))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MtnClimber

Follow closely the socialist policies at play in California. Watch the gas tax and the cigarette tax. The first will push many gas stations near the border into financial problems, and the second will create a smuggling industry.


11 posted on 04/29/2017 7:51:31 AM PDT by I am Richard Brandon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MtnClimber

I do agree that airlines should have more aircraft. If daily flight are packed then holidays are going to be a nightmare. I know there is extra costs to additional aircraft but the current “just in time plane” strategy is stupid.


12 posted on 04/29/2017 7:53:32 AM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MtnClimber

In a word, yes.


13 posted on 04/29/2017 7:59:18 AM PDT by NonValueAdded (#DeplorableMe #BitterClinger #HillNO! #cishet #MyPresident #MAGA #Winning)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MtnClimber

I used to think that it was wrong to “feel” about an issue, that only what one “thinks” about an issue matters. I now understand that without “gut feel” one would never be able to make a decision. Nevertheless, I swear these people have no rational side at all, nothing BUT their feelings. And that’s a mess.


14 posted on 04/29/2017 8:04:09 AM PDT by ichabod1 (I call Obama "osama" because he damaged us far more than Osama bin Ladin ever did.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MtnClimber

Yes, they love evil more than good because their deeds are evil. They have burned their conscience and remain in the prison cells of Satan, deniers of God and His Word. And they will be judged by Him they deny, Jesus Christ our Lord and Saviour of all who believe Him as the Way and the truth and the life.


16 posted on 04/29/2017 8:28:00 AM PDT by kindred (Jesus Christ is Lord and Saviour. President Trump is restoring America !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MtnClimber

Most are abject imbeciles who do the dirty work for the others who are just plain evil


18 posted on 04/29/2017 8:34:48 AM PDT by clamper1797 (We are getting close to the last "box")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MtnClimber

I suggest that both many progrssives and many conservatives are irrationa, and with the same variety of bad thought processes.

False pre-supposition, logical conclusion is by far the most common. You see this in wife beating questions the media asks of conservatives.

Guilt by association on top of bogus start. Richard Spencer has not denounced some obscure racist nobody ever heard of. Bannon did not censor Spencer. Trump hired Bannon. Therefore Trump is a racist. Guilt by association almost always has an early pre-supposition that is suspect.

Guilt by role. It is the duty of an attorney to represent his client and the best interests of his client. The left holds it against a Republican who was a lawyer for a businessman. The right holds it against a Democrat who was a lawyer for a street gang member.

Proof by anecdote. Too many anecdotes to recite.

Proof by statistics. Too many to recite.

Refusal to admit the sausage factory. Reagan had two priority goals and many lesser goals as president. In the Grand Compromise Reagan and Speaker Tip O’Neil made a deal. Tip would allow Reagan to cut taxes and defeat Communism. In turn Reagan would let the Democrats spend like drunken ... like Drunken Democrats.

So Reagan’s Supply Side Tax Cut greatly increased tax revenue. But the combination of increased defense spending and Drunken Democrat spending exceeded the increased tax revenue and Reagan had budget deficits.

The left conveniently ignores the increased spending and claims that Supply Side tax cuts don’t work because there was a deficit under Reagan.

Many Bush type Republicans don’t want to admit Voodoo tax cuts work. So they don’t want the truth of the Reagan era to be spread.

And those who do support Supply Side tax cuts don’t want the name of Reagan sullied by a Compromise ... let alone the Grand Compromise.

There are many other styles of irrational argument.

Can anyone make a factual, logical case for Repeal of the Law of Supply and Demand when it comes to Global Trade or Immigration? Nobody has made one yet.

From Smoot Hawley to Bush II sheet steel every single anecdote says attempts to repeal the law of supply and demand have failed.

Recent immigrants (legal and illegal), especially Hispanics, did not create the defects in our legal system. They did not create our welfare system. Yet they are blamed for our current situation that we older Americans created.

There is a big difference between immigrants who work and those who collect welfare and/or rape and steal. Yet some Populists illogically lump them all together.

Conclusion. None of us are perfect. Yes, The Left is illogical. But we should be careful before we embarrass ourselves with hypocrisy.


20 posted on 04/29/2017 8:49:23 AM PDT by spintreebob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MtnClimber

They don’t take subtle second order effects into account. They don’t consider subtleties like unknown unknowns and opportunity costs and the finer aspects of reality that can’t even be articulated. They think in static models and ignore feedback effects. They have no appreciation for irony and paradox and are always caught off guard by the witty ways in which reality punishes a lack of wisdom.

The problem is that their ideas are too simple. There is a certain logic to giving the smart, nice people lots of power over everyone else. It basically took Hayek to articulate why that logic is false using extremely subtle arguments dealing with unplanned order and the flow of information and distributed intelligence. Yet even before Hayek it was possible to understand that it was false through an understanding of rights and morality as well as by gut feel and wisdom and intuition. But liberals completely lack that intuition or don’t have it turned on. Sometimes the turning on happens — you see it in Sowell and Horowitz — but most are doomed to stay fully convinced by their bonehead first-order ideas which never work.


21 posted on 04/29/2017 8:55:17 AM PDT by Yardstick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MtnClimber

Yes.


22 posted on 04/29/2017 9:03:23 AM PDT by mulligan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MtnClimber

Yes they are. Several reasons:
The need to be ‘cool’ and/or seen as smart. - I’m guessing inner lack of self esteem.

And the capacity for stupid seems to be increasing. I know dem voters who have high intelligence capacity... college educated idiots, professors, etc... they talk a good game, seem to recollect a huge amount of ‘information’ (lib propaganda) but have very little by way of common sense or basic logic.

Then you have the typical blue collar, union guy dem voter. Not book smart or college educated, yet brilliant if you need actual stuff done... ( build your addition, wire your house, dress a deer even), but they don’t think they’re smart. So they join the ‘smart team’ - dimmocrats. And root for that team no matter what, to the death.
They worship their leaders, no matter what scumbags those leaders are.

At least most on the right want to hold OUR elected leaders accountable.


24 posted on 04/29/2017 9:06:37 AM PDT by joethedrummer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MtnClimber

Not “hopelessly irrational”, but “proudly irrational”.

Liberalism today is fueled by the scourge of Postmodernism, which denies logic, reason and truth.


25 posted on 04/29/2017 9:06:45 AM PDT by aquila48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MtnClimber
Are Liberals Hopelessly Irrational?

No.

They are mentally ill.

26 posted on 04/29/2017 9:11:55 AM PDT by Lazamataz (The "news" networks and papers are bitter, dangerous enemies of the American people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson