Here's a lesson in reading comprehension! I never said Dryfuss was on the view. I said, if he was serious about his SUDDEN LOVE for the constitution and not being partisan, he would go on the view! However, he feels the need to tell conservatives about the need for civics classes! Who knew conservatives don't support civics classes!
Dryfuss for eight years NEVER said a word about Obummer shredding the Constitution ever . Three months after Trump is elected, Dryfuss feels the need to get on with Tucker to tell the viewers that only congress can spend OR withhold money. The constitution says so! Since Trump is the only one I know of who is talking of withholding money from sanctuary cities, I don't think it's a coincidence.
Nice job Dryfuss, camouflage your hate for Trump with your sudden love for the constitution.
Sadly you watched twice but missed the part where he actually states he is not into political parties...i.e. -he is not a democrat...
And you believe that ....wow! A Hollywierd liberal says something and a Freeper believes him.......I'm speachless!
Yet you rant and attack both him and me with no basis. just like to see thoughtful, accurate, articulate posts on Free Republic...
Sooooo, you're thoughtful, accurate, and articulate. However, I rant and attack liberals. Never thought I'd see a liberal defended by a Freeper, maybe you should look up the definition of thoughtful, accurate, and articulate.
I am not going to spend an hour looking to see if he was on The View...that really should be your job to look before you post.
Here’s a lesson in reading comprehension! I never said Dryfuss was on the view. I said, if he was serious about his SUDDEN LOVE for the constitution and not being partisan, he would go on the view! However, he feels the need to tell conservatives about the need for civics classes! Who knew conservatives don’t support civics classes!
Dryfuss for eight years NEVER said a word about Obummer shredding the Constitution ever . Three months after Trump is elected, Dryfuss feels the need to get on with Tucker to tell the viewers that only congress can spend OR withhold money. The constitution says so! Since Trump is the only one I know of who is talking of withholding money from sanctuary cities, I don’t think it’s a coincidence.
Nice job Dryfuss, camouflage your hate for Trump with your sudden love for the constitution.
Sadly you watched twice but missed the part where he actually states he is not into political parties...i.e. -he is not a democrat...
And you believe that ....wow! A Hollywierd liberal says something and a Freeper believes him.......I’m speachless!
Yet you rant and attack both him and me with no basis. just like to see thoughtful, accurate, articulate posts on Free Republic...
Sooooo, you’re thoughtful, accurate, and articulate. However, I rant and attack liberals. Never thought I’d see a liberal defended by a Freeper, maybe you should look up the definition of thoughtful, accurate, and articulate.
Seriously, you need to chill a bit—
Reading comprehension...Well your post is sloppy. I never said that you said Dreyfuss was on The View...you said ‘until he goes on the View’ which means you clearly thought he was not ever on it or any other liberal show...That was YOUR prerequisite for accepting that he might have changed...you should know one way or the other if he was on the View. Not my job to verify all of your OPINIONS which you are purporting as facts...As I said, Dreyfuss was on numerous other liberal programs similar to The View....I found them, and you ignored that fact...but started a straw man argument about the View.
Listen FRiend, you are very, very new here; and seriously, you have a lot to learn.
1. I am not defending liberals. You are the first in my nearly 17 years of posting threads and commenting that has ever accused me of supporting liberals—except for the brief time when Freepers were first supporting Trump and some Cruz supporters thought Trump was a Democrat in disguise..Ah but that was waaay before your time here...(BTW, in my time here,I have 139 threads posted and 17,758 replies.)
Dreyfuss was not espousing a liberal position and denounced partisan politics in lieu of Constitution and Bill of Rights. When Tucker wanted to get into politics, Dreyfuss refused...You listened twice, so clearly you should know that. I also told you that Dreyfuss went to Iowa to see Ted Cruz during the campaign—no doubt because of their mutual interest in the Constitution. No liberal would be caught dead doing that. He may not be a fan of Trump’s agenda, but I don’t believe Dreyfuss was disguising his hate by starting his Constitution crusade 5 years ago...Again, you would make more sense if you would research...
2. If you had bothered to research, you would not be posting tripe like: ...if he was serious about his SUDDEN LOVE for the Constitution and not being partisan, he would go on the View! Again, I don’t know if he was on the View, your Holy Grail, and I am not going to take any more time to research it—I did find numerous shows he was on that are liberal and listed them for you...but you did not want to concede.
Had you bothered to do a little research, you would see that with one YouTube search, he has been promoting the Constitution for FIVE YEARS...That is not “Sudden.”
“Dryfuss for eight years NEVER said a word about Obummer shredding the Constitution ever”
Again, how can you say that with no research??? Dreyfuss has been advocating for civics and the Constitution for FIVE years ...Those FIVE YEARS are actually during OBAMA’s term...So once AGAIN, STOP SAYING STUFF THAT IS NOT ACCURATE...DO YOUR RESEARCH and you will look smarter here.
3. I do research before I post when possible. I think it adds to the conversation. Why should anyone read unsubstantiated facts or opinion...Again, you sloppily misquoted me...I did not say that I was thoughtful accurate and articulate...I said “I just like to see thoughtful, accurate, articulate posts on Free Republic...,” and yours are not because you just spout off without any regard for the facts.
So welcome to Free Republic...Have a nice weekend~I am done with this conversation as it is going nowhere and clearly we agree on nothing.