If real evidence surfaced that Assad did not commit a Sarin gas attack I would have no problem being critical of Trump’s decision.
Since none of us here have any real evidence either way that makes it a 50/50 proposition from our cheap seats POV. That puts that question 100% in the realm of speculation.
Apparently some would rather err on the side that Trump is easily led/naive/a globalist/a liar/etc. I think you’ve pegged it.
It makes it much more than a 50/50 proposition if we trust the man we elected President. Thus far, there is absolutely no reason not to, and indeed ample reason for trusting him.
Apparently some would rather err on the side that Trump is easily led/naive/a globalist/a liar/etc.
Precisely. And all we've seen so far is evidence that totally repudiates such a notion. So, again, those who would "err" on that side are exposing their latent NeverTrump tendencies.