Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

On target: US claims 100 percent success as 59 missiles hit 59 targets at Syrian airfield
Washington Examiner ^

Posted on 04/07/2017 3:23:43 PM PDT by springwater13

The Pentagon says the highly-accurate satellite guided missiles, launched from two ships in the Mediterranean sea, hit every target with pinpoint precision.

It took launching 61 missiles total to put 59 on target. One missile failed, and another had to be aborted. In both cases another missile was launched to take its place.

The Pentagon released imagery that shows hardened shelters were no match for the cruise missiles. Each of the targeted shelters had a hole in the top, and charred airplane wreckage scattered nearby.

The U.S. is still doing a more complete assessment, but estimates 20 Syrian warplanes were destroyed either in bunkers or in the clear.

In addition, a Russian-made surface-to-air missile site and its associated radar was destroyed, essentially rendering the airfield unprotected against a future attack, at least in the short term.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonexaminer.com ...


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: syria; syriabombed; tomahawks
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141 next last
To: springwater13

Every camel was destroyed with extreme prejudice?


21 posted on 04/07/2017 3:40:14 PM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: springwater13

The ride was fun while it lasted. Now can’t wait until the end of this administration.


22 posted on 04/07/2017 3:40:34 PM PDT by Sam Gamgee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Democrats hate too much

Apparently if you disagree with someone on here you’re a coward? My definition of a coward is someone who hides behind a fake name and calls people they don’t know a coward.


23 posted on 04/07/2017 3:40:50 PM PDT by Terry Mross (Liver spots And blood thinners.,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Teacher317

“Fighter jets and defense systems cannot be replaced quite as quickly”

Last time I checked fighter jets can be flown in to a functional air base. A new radar set up easily fits if the back of a cargo jet.


24 posted on 04/07/2017 3:41:03 PM PDT by Emergencyawesome
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Teacher317

Trump must have been pretty sure his intel was good. Pretty brave.


25 posted on 04/07/2017 3:41:24 PM PDT by Democrats hate too much
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: BlackVeil

You can’t even spell Mrs. Clinton’s name correctly.... and I fail to see where Hillary ever suggested bombing despots for using chemical weapons. You post makes no sense whatsoever.


26 posted on 04/07/2017 3:41:31 PM PDT by Teacher317 (We have now sunk to a depth at which restatement of the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Sam Gamgee

Well, I’m skeptical, but isn’t that a bit much?


27 posted on 04/07/2017 3:43:18 PM PDT by Uncle Miltie (The Washington Post is Jeff Bezos' Fake News unregulated SuperPAC.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Teacher317

“ROFLMAO, you think a nation like Syria has extra lying around”
Russia does, I believe they are in the area.

“today was the message that despots can not use chemical weapons without repercussions.”
So no way ISIS staged this?


28 posted on 04/07/2017 3:43:37 PM PDT by Emergencyawesome
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Sam Gamgee

Bet you came down on the Cruz supporters, calling them names like Cruzbot and calling Cruz a liar.

My apologies if you were not one of those people.


29 posted on 04/07/2017 3:44:01 PM PDT by madison10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: springwater13

My coworkers are CONVINCED that it was Trump who did the chemical attacks in order to pin it on Assad and pull a ‘wag the dog’ with it all - in order to divert attention to all the “illegal crap” he’s doing to us here at home.... it’s laughable to me cos it’s ‘logic’ to them.


30 posted on 04/07/2017 3:44:05 PM PDT by joethedrummer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Miltie

DJT is dead to me. If I wanted this, I would support Hillary.


31 posted on 04/07/2017 3:45:12 PM PDT by Sam Gamgee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: springwater13

According to Reuters Syria is already flying again out of this airbase striking areas of the Homs countryside.

Didn’t accomplish much, but then again bombing ISIS isn’t such a bad thing.


32 posted on 04/07/2017 3:45:47 PM PDT by bereanway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: springwater13

DJT is doing much better than the mass media admits. Here’s a current ongoing poll www.smdailyjournal..com —voting is at upper right) - this poll is right in Nancy Pelosi’s liberal California backyard !! We asked: How much do you approve of the job performance of President Trump?
Poll Results
Opinion Graph Votes
Strongly approve

44%
Approve

10%
Neutral

3%
Disapprove

3%
Strongly disapprove

40%
Total Votes: 900


33 posted on 04/07/2017 3:46:22 PM PDT by faithhopecharity ("Politicans are not born, they're excreted." -- Marcus Tillius Cicero)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: madison10

Not me actually. Always liked Cruz. Seems DJT is flushing out Bannon and the populists and embracing the neo cons. Oh well, maybe a third Bush administration is still better than Hillary? Bitter sweet.


34 posted on 04/07/2017 3:46:25 PM PDT by Sam Gamgee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Emergencyawesome

I don’t think the cost/value pencils out well for using cruise missiles to bomb an airfield that can be repaired in a few days...and likely has no strategic significance

Destroying complex fighter aircraft does though.


35 posted on 04/07/2017 3:46:45 PM PDT by lacrew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Emergencyawesome

Taking out the aircraft delivery systems was good enough. Cruise missiles are not made for catering runways.

Use something like BLU-107 Durandals to take out runways, which would take aircraft to deliver them.


36 posted on 04/07/2017 3:46:58 PM PDT by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: DIRTYSECRET
Accurate: Who was that accuracy message meant for?

For hardened aircraft shelters. GPS makes it easy these days. My handheld GPS has accuracy down to 12' to 15' - dang good.

37 posted on 04/07/2017 3:51:15 PM PDT by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

59 missiles to take out 9 old Migs that can be easily replaced by Russia is not the greatest use of resources


38 posted on 04/07/2017 3:52:07 PM PDT by Emergencyawesome
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Sam Gamgee

Wow, Sam Gamgee, when they wake up the mole, they really wake him up! Tell you boss Putin, he’s toast. Trump thinks nothing of him. He’s going down when and where Trump chooses.


39 posted on 04/07/2017 3:54:49 PM PDT by Born to Conserve
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Emergencyawesome

Article says 20 A/C destroyed that are likely Sukhoi, which is a full squadron of planes. Some of the missiles were likely programed to take out static support equipment and alike.


40 posted on 04/07/2017 3:57:23 PM PDT by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson