Posted on 04/04/2017 2:18:51 PM PDT by heterosupremacist
The Qur’an has also mentioned the waiting period [i.e. for a divorced wife to remarry] for the wife who has not yet menstruated, saying: “And those who no longer expect menstruation among your women, if you doubt, then their period is three months, and [also for] those who have not menstruated” [Qur’an 65:4].
Since this is not negated later, we can take from this verse that it is permissible to have sexual intercourse with a prepubescent girl. The Qur’an is not like the books of jurisprudence which mention what the implications of things are, even if they are prohibited. It is true that the prophet entered into a marriage contract with A’isha when she was six years old, however he did not have sex with her until she was nine years old, according to al-Bukhari.
Other countries make Muhammad’s example the basis of their laws regarding the legal marriageable age for girls. Article 1041 of the Civil Code of the Islamic Republic of Iran states that girls can be engaged before the age of nine, and married at nine: “Marriage before puberty (nine full lunar years for girls) is prohibited. Marriage contracted before reaching puberty with the permission of the guardian is valid provided that the interests of the ward are duly observed.”
According to Amir Taheri in The Spirit of Allah: Khomeini and the Islamic Revolution (pp. 90-91), Iran’s Ayatollah Khomeini himself married a ten-year-old girl when he was twenty-eight. Khomeini called marriage to a prepubescent girl “a divine blessing,” and advised the faithful to give their own daughters away accordingly: “Do your best to ensure that your daughters do not see their first blood in your house.”
When he took power in Iran, he lowered the legal marriageable age of girls to nine, in accord with Muhammad’s example.
(Excerpt) Read more at jihadwatch.org ...
A sick religion that was founded by a monster
And women in this Republic want to join Islam because ?????
Because they went to college.
It is halal (permitted) because Mohammed did it. In Islam there is only halal and haram (not permitted). And if big Mo did it it is halal.
Islam is EVIL and needs to be eradicated
In fact, if you don’t do it the way Mo did it, it’s an innovation, and is unlawful, blameworthy, reprehensible, unpraiseworthy, and disgraceful!
Where are the women marchers, one might ask.
Tht is exactly how Mohammad ibn Abdul Wahhab (1700s) looked at things that were corrupting Islam - innovations.
Wahhabi Islam is named after him, and it is a back to basics Islam which is embraced presently by ISIS, al Qaeda and other militant Islamic groups,and pushed by Saudi Arabia.
Wahhabism has gotten a lot of us Kafirs killed, along with many Muslim Heretics who try to add innovations to the religion or try to modernize it.
Coincidentally, I agree with Wahhab's fundamental interpretation of Islam and it is not good for us Kafirs. - Tom
And the Montana democrats want sharia in their courts.
These f=ing mooselimbs are really horse crap.
Wahhabism has gotten a lot of us Kafirs killed, along with many Muslim Heretics who try to add innovations to the religion or try to modernize it.
Which is why it cannot be “reformed.”
Agreed.
You can't reform Islam because the religion has Muhammad as the perfect man showing how to implement it the way God wants it done.
Any interpretations contrary to what Muhammad did is heresy. -Tom
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.