1 posted on
03/27/2017 6:51:11 PM PDT by
firebrand
To: firebrand
This appeared today on page 2 in a somewhat altered form.
2 posted on
03/27/2017 6:52:05 PM PDT by
firebrand
To: firebrand
Apparently the NYT is rigorously accurate, factual, and perfect 99.999% of the time.
But once in awhile, they print a “cq” or “tk” that they regret.
3 posted on
03/27/2017 6:55:08 PM PDT by
ClearCase_guy
(Abortion is what slavery was: immoral but not illegal. Not yet.)
To: LS; nathanbedford; Travis McGee; miss marmelstein; Clemenza; justiceseeker93; StarFan; ...
ping
I remember when the papers switched to cold type. A couple of friends were working on this for different newspapers. I also remember fondly the Linotype days. We used to have to travel by air to read the proofs on a rush project—no computers, no FedEx.
4 posted on
03/27/2017 7:00:00 PM PDT by
firebrand
To: firebrand
I’m just here for the Hillary Clinton and Madeline Albright photos.
8 posted on
03/27/2017 7:12:27 PM PDT by
dangus
To: firebrand
When the Times staff does criticize themselves, they praise themselves with faint damnation.
asdf ;lkj
14 posted on
03/27/2017 8:12:44 PM PDT by
tinyowl
(A is A)
To: firebrand
Excerpt: I hate to stop and look up a fact
So nothing has changed at the NY Times.
To: firebrand
On the topic of "things no reader should have to see" ....
23 posted on
03/28/2017 3:14:30 AM PDT by
Enchante
(Libtards are enemies of true civilization!)
To: firebrand
Things No Reader Should Have to See Actual news?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson