Posted on 03/21/2017 4:36:20 PM PDT by RummyChick
The disclosure that Jamie Gorelick, a member of the September 11 commission, was personally responsible for instituting a key obstacle to cooperation between law enforcement and intelligence operations before the terrorist attacks raises disturbing questions about the integrity of the commission itself. Ms. Gorelick should not be cross-examining witnesses; instead, she should be required to testify about her own behavior under oath. Specifically, commission members need to ask her about a 1995 directive she wrote that made it more difficult for the FBI to locate two of the September 11 hijackers who had already entered the country by the summer of 2001.
On Tuesday, Attorney General John Ashcroft declassified a four-page directive sent by Ms. Gorelick (the No. 2 official in the Clinton Justice Department) on March 4, 1995, to FBI Director Louis Freeh and Mary Jo White, the New York-based U.S. attorney investigating the 1993 World Trade Center bombing. In the memo, Ms. Gorelick ordered Mr. Freeh and Ms. White to follow information-sharing procedures that “go beyond what is legally required,” in order to avoid “any risk of creating an unwarranted appearance” that the Justice Department was using Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) warrants, instead of ordinary criminal investigative procedures, in an effort to undermine the civil liberties of terrorism suspects.
(Excerpt) Read more at m.washingtontimes.com ...
GORELICK and CLINTON are DIRECTLY responsible for 9/11
The FBI had a paid informant living with two jijackers and he reported their intentions to FBI handler and FBI HQ..... no action taken by FBI... REMEMBER AGENTS IN AZ AND FLA AND MINN MADE REPORTS ABOUT UNUSUAL ARAB FLYING INTERESTS.... no action taken by FBI...
Clinton/ Gorelick were trying to prevent the CIA knowledge of PRC Chinese campaign contributions, SELLING OUT MISSLE GUIDANCE AND NUKE SUB PROPELLER TECHNOLOGY TO CHINA and crooked deals with Riady... those were the resons for THE WALL... to cover clinton;s crooked ass.
THE FBI TODAY CONTINUES ITS JOB OF CLEAN UP COVERUP CANT CONNECT THE DOTS WITNESS SUPPRESSION AND TAMPERINGI WTH EVIDENCE....
it doesnt work for you and me rather against you and me.... and the CONSTITUTION..... COMEY is just the latest in a string of scumbags to head the FBI...
Read the thread cupcake.
The links you go to, to avoid quoting me, are getting pathetic. Post a quote of me “attacking” someone or admit you’re wrong.
The more I hear about the issue with Gorelick the more scary I see the influence that an already liberal Ivanka has in the WH. I never voted for Ivanka I voted for her father.
I’ve already give you instructions as to what to do. So go do it.
Oh yes. Ashcroft caught her in a lie on national television.
I attacked no one.
Let it go.
Oh, and to quote your hero, stop stalking me.
She’s not my hero, I don’t know her from Adam and go away.
You lied about me, and claimed I “attacked” someone while providing zero evidence. Why don’t YOU knock off the smears, and stop harassing me?
Just do yourself a big favor and shut up.
” but will understand rules for handling classified material. “
When did that become important?
Sometimes you just have to walk away from the crazy ;-)
You are the one with the obsession. You posted a lie, cannot back it up, but cannot let it go. That’s unhealthy.
Here’s what you do Fantasy person. You stop posting to people who don’t buy your bull.
Let’s say the situation were reversed. Suppose someone accused you, repeatedly, of attacking a person, but you had not attacked anyone. You requested evidence of the alleged attack, but no evidence was provided. You were simply called names and insulted.
If it is a Non-Christian doing the accusing/name-calling, well, what can you do? Non-Christians can lie, smear or malign at will; they have no Lord who forbids such things.
What if it’s a Christian who is falsely accusing you?
Well, I wouldn’t think a Christian would do that. It violates the Golden Rule.
Just some thoughts on the matter. Since you are continuing the exchange, we may as well put it in context.
Blah, blah, blah. Stop posting your nonsense.
So you characterize a reference to the Golden Rule as “Blah, blah, blah.”
I see.
Really not reading your posts, sorry. Life’s too short.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.