[MtnClimber]

A very good article about methods used by the left.

[Still Thinking]

“You must be one of those deniers who rejects the science consensus.”

"You must be one of those gullible crackheads that believe every lie science giants like Algore invent to enrich themselves and steal our liberty."

[Uversabound]

I work with middle aged, down to young people in my office.

Anyone under 30 is lost to discussion about globull warming.

Settled science you see.

[Zathras]

Always a good reply to Academics.
“Do you really want to take advice and leadership from a divinity student who got a C- in Chemistry?”
ie Al Gore

Of course you might want to step back a few paces before you say it.

[Teotwawki]

Anyone who understands science should reject consensus as a valid method of proof for any hypothesis.

[UCANSEE2]

I can prove global warming scientifically.

There are no glaciers at my house.

[Huskrrrr]

I’m amazed by how many libs with absolutely no science background are “experts” on global warming, ie this history professor.

[DuncanWaring]

Michael Crichton made an excellent observation on "consensus":

Let’s be clear: the work of science has nothing whatever to do with consensus. Consensus is the business of politics. Science, on the contrary, requires only one investigator who happens to be right, which means that he or she has results that are verifiable by reference to the real world. In science consensus is irrelevant. What is relevant is reproducible results. The greatest scientists in history are great precisely because they broke with the consensus.

There is no such thing as consensus science. If it’s consensus, it isn’t science. If it’s science, it isn’t consensus. Period.

[Kickass Conservative]

Just ask, if it’s true, how are you going to “fix” it?

Please provide valid cost / benefit numbers that will guarantee a successful reversal of Global Warming / Climate Change including a detailed day by day project planner and the exact end date of a successful transition.

I will also be helpful to determine the standard Average worldwide Temperature so the Goal Line will be transparent to those who lack understanding of the process.

[InABunkerUnderSF]

List of false leftist memes in my lifetime:
DDT is poisoning the world and must be banned immediately and for all time!
The population bomb will starve us all!
Nuclear power threatens all life on earth!
Resource depletion will cause the colapse of our civilization!
Acid rain is poisoning the world!
The hole in the ozone layer will cause us all to die of skin cancer!
Anthropogenic global warming will destroy all life on earth!

The thing they all have in common is that they are all anti-capitalist, like the leftists who spout them. The best way kill a leftist is to starve them by cutting off their government funding.

[Governor Dinwiddie]

Well, when you push back against "scientific consensus" you are going to get smacked down by the "theologians" of the day. Our present day Gaia "theologians" are not much different from the establishment "theologians" of Galileo's day. Galileo was condemned and imprisoned for daring to question the "scientific consensus": the Galileo affair.

I remember many years ago Rush mocking "scientific consensus". He sarcatically suggested that the way to all truth is to "take a vote on it".

[rktman]

LOL! Yup. I’m one. Got my scarlet “D” to wear proudly all ready to go. Good way to watch heads ‘splode——? Toss these at the warmunists:

1. Define the “correct” temperature range for the planet.

2. Define the “correct” humidity range for the planet.

3. Define the “correct” mean sea level for the planet’.

4. Define the “correct” amount of precipitation for the planet.

5. Define the “correct” makeup of the atmosphere.

6. Define the “correct” amount of sea ice at the N/S poles.

7. Define/explain past glaciation and subsequent warming without any input from humans.

Add others as you see fit.

[rktman]

Linky thing for m. strong club of rome.

https://quadrant.org.au/opinion/doomed-planet/2015/12/discovering-maurice-strong/

[ransomnote]

I am old enough to remember when Dems and Repubs disagreed on many things, and then went to lunch. The Dems have demonized Repubs to the point where I’m expected to be “ashamed” of myself for being a repub because, according to Dems and their allegations are the only proof needed, I’m a laundry list of “hate” etc. This article nails it, the shift from being free to choose your party to being labeled vile, evil etc. for choosing other than Dem.

[GOPJ]

Hoffer then goes on to cite the historian F.A. Voigt’s account of a Japanese mission to Berlin in 1932 to study the National Socialist Movement. Voigt asked a member of the mission what he thought. He replied, “It is magnificent. I wish we could have something like it in Japan, only we can’t, because we haven’t got any Jews.” This brought a bit of clarity as to why the mass movement, rather brilliantly, wants to label those of us who have questions as “deniers.”

Totalitarians use the same playbooks...

[cincinnati65]

If there weren’t individuals to challenge “consensus”, we’d be running around racially segregated thinking the world is flat, and that the sun revolves around us.

[Only1choice____Freedom]

They lost all credibility when it was discovered that Mars was experiencing the same global warming the Earth was.

Since then, it has stopped and reversed course.

Nobody had to “hide the decline” in climate reading from Mars.

This professor sounds like a “True believer” and no amount of real facts can persuade him.

“Be polite, Be professional, but have a plan to kill everyone you meet.” - Gen. Mad Dog Mattis

[Stand Watch Listen]

BOOKMARK

[TigersEye]

“You must be one of those deniers who rejects the science consensus.”

I deny that there is a consensus. In fact I'll prove that there is not.

Global Warming Skeptics Question Authority

Princeton Professor Denies Global Warming Theory Jan. 12, 2009

Princeton Physics Professor Discredits Anthropogenic Climate Change Theory Dec. 21, 2016

German scientists reject man-made global warming

Real Scientist Uncover Serious Flaw In Global Warming Data

Physicist Howard Hayden's one-letter disproof of global warming claims [pre-Climategate]

'Consensus' On Man-Made Global Warming Collapses in 2008

Perth electrical engineer's discovery will change climate change debate October 04, 2015

Top Physicist Freeman Dyson: Obama 'Took the Wrong Side' on Climate Change October 14, 2015

Global Warming Petition Project Scientists who reject AGW
31,487 American scientists have signed this petition, including 9,029 with PhDs

Prominent Scientists Declare Climate Claims Ahead of UN Summit 'Irrational' * 'Based On Nonsense' * 'Leading us down a false path' November 19, 2015

97 Articles Refuting The “97% Consensus”

I think that proves beyond consensus that those who claim there is a consensus are liars.