Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 03/19/2017 5:10:43 PM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: nickcarraway

l8r


2 posted on 03/19/2017 5:18:51 PM PDT by preacher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway
An earlier version of this story incorrectly referred to the IRS form on one occassion as Form 8948 not 8949

A later version misspelled occasion.

3 posted on 03/19/2017 5:28:54 PM PDT by palmer (turn into nonpaper w no identifying heading and send nonsecure)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

Why didn’t they setup this Coinbase company offshore?


4 posted on 03/19/2017 5:33:21 PM PDT by McGruff (#PlugTheLeaks)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

I reported them. I never thought I would be one of 812 in the country doing anything.

I guess I am the fool.


5 posted on 03/19/2017 5:38:16 PM PDT by Vermont Lt (Brace. Brace. Brace. Heads down. Do not look up.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway
The IRS created this problem by declaring Bitcoin a "property", and that it shall be valued at the time received by "fair market value". One problem is the value at the time depends upon which market, and what time of day it is valued because markets rise and fall greatly. Also, when being mined, it depends if you're mining as an individual or as a pool, as to when received, and the amount received - all of which has to be recorded, and a basis established when selling or transferring varying quantities at some later date, all of which may have been valued far differently - this creates an accounting nightmare!

I'm quite certain the great number of miners, traders, and investors simply claimed any profits as regular income or use some other method of calculating capital gains.

There wouldn't have been a problem if the IRS simply declared Bitcoin a commodity, as tax agencies of many other countries have, instead of a "property".

Which begs the question, is the IRS going to fine those who declared profits as simple income, and likely at a higher tax rates, or as capital gains only not reported via this particular form?

The problem is NOT with Bitcoiners, the problem is with the IRS's decision to declare Bitcoin a property. This is an issue in all probably Congress needs to address, or perhaps Trump could issue an EO declaring Bitcoin a commodity.

8 posted on 03/19/2017 5:59:31 PM PDT by amorphous
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

I’m trying to decide whether to have more contempt for Bitcoiners than I have for the IRS.


10 posted on 03/19/2017 6:18:09 PM PDT by Crossfeed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

Just keep your bitcoins in your own wallet and nobody will have anything to report.


11 posted on 03/19/2017 6:54:43 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (President Trump is coming, and the rule of law is coming with him.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: IncPen

ping


12 posted on 03/19/2017 8:05:27 PM PDT by Nailbiter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway
...only a tiny percentage of virtual currency owners are reporting profits or losses in their annual returns.

You don't need to report anything annually if you buy and hold. Most are holders.

17 posted on 03/19/2017 9:14:52 PM PDT by bkopto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson