Posted on 03/04/2017 8:59:01 AM PST by JLAGRAYFOX
Here is my thought. If President Trump Tweeted this he had better have hard evidence to back it up.
In this day and age with a Media composed almost entirely with Liberal Democrats, the Left gets away with turning gossip and innuendo into Fact. re: The Russians are coming.
We cannot compete unless the evidence in 100% Concrete.
Notice that President Trump didn’t accuse the Obama “Administration”, he accused Obama. That is going Nuclear.
I will adopt a wait and see attitude. This is only the beginning.
CBS Reporter: “If there was a wiretap at Trump Tower, it just means a federal judge found probable cause of crime by Trump - not Obama.”
That pretty much summed up how one guy put it early this morning on Fox & Friends. I had just woken up and all of this was happening so fast.
Well here the thing.. we know for a fact a Flynn was wiretapped recorded and released which is illegal so that puts it in play
Because even if it was just the NSA was recording the Russians that is allowed.
Once they stumbled on Flynn’s conversation unless they had a court order that they were supposed to turn it off because not supposed to record American citizens.
And so recording was it illegal and releasing it was definitely illegal
They are saying “where is the evidence”, which is delicious in its own right.
” If President Trump Tweeted this he had better have hard evidence to back it up.”
He DOES! He got a dossier from McCain. /s
Wasn’t the National Review a bunch of never-Trumpers?
And this is coming out now? Did the NR know about it then?
You said “This is Watergate x 1000”?
I say, “This is OBAMAGATE!”
Won't be readable because of an encrustation of urea, creatinine, uric acid, and trace amounts of enzymes, carbohydrates, hormones, fatty acids and pigments that will be left by normal Americans quietly expressing their opinions of his life and his Presidency.
LOL!!!!! >:-)
Sorry...
CNN can’t handle “proof” (i.e. REAL news)
All the FOX shows have had panels talking about this since Wednesday.
Wasn’t the National Review a bunch of never-Trumpers? Yes!
This is coming out now? Did the NR know about it then?
An excellent question, as much as I dislike the NR’s vile never Trumpsters, hopefully they were not involved in this.
If so, they need to charged with co conspiracy charges if when charges are brought forth.
The data on Watergate 2.0 or Trumpgate is so damning, that even they are finally getting on the right side.
“I suspect reports of Valerie Jarrett seeking shelter at Obama’s DC residence are related to a potential subpoena in this matter...”
That tie in is very possible.
“If Schumer and Pelosi do not come out with a full court defense of Obama, we will know Obama is in deep doo doo.”
Wonder how many top rats are in the Führer’s bunker, aka Obama’s new DC home. Trying to figure out to keep Trumpgate/Watergate 2.0 from destroying them.
My second wonder of the day. Who will they sacrifice and throw under Obama’s bus to save his hide and the other top DC rats?
If they do, my bet would be Jarrett, unless she commits a Clinton suicide and confesses she did the FISA.
How will the Democrats handle this?
How do they usually handle criminality within their ranks?
We, on the other hand, will likely roll over and just let it slide, when what we SHOULD do is nail their butts to the wall.
Here’s the talking point: THE DEMOCRATS were illegally attempting TO INFLUENCE THE ELECTION!!! It’s plain as day. Why aren’t we going after them on this???
1. Wiretapping a candidate’s HOME, and even violating the FISA warrant.
2. Voter fraud-—Obama ON TAPE encouraging illegal aliens to vote.
3. Manipulating the media, rigging polls.
4. Voter intimidation: payments to rent-a-mobs.
5. Voter intimidation: thugs beating up Trump supporters
6. Violating states’ rights re: Obama appointed activist judges overturning states’ voter ID laws.
7. Involving Homeland Security in voting oversight, in violation of states’ rights
8. Jill Stein
9. 10....on and on....
Sorry boys and girls, the jig is up.
So the coup against President Trump is going to succeed?
Thanks. It was the source of a lot of ridicule on Facebook the day after Trump won the nomination. Not so much on 9 November.
It’s far worse than Watergate.
I was thinking that about your post.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.