It was not “inaccurate” at all.
It was not inaccurate, because he was being asked about meetings within the context of the Trump campaign and not in general. And both of the meetings he had were within his official capacity and were part of his job and had nothing to do with Trump or US politics.
That said, I’ve been very disappointed in Trump’s willingness to hand over sacrifices to the Dems. He should have defended Flynn, because the Dems found out with Flynn how easy it was to get Trump to abandon somebody who had done nothing wrong and now they’re doing the same with Sessions. Trump’s defense of him was rather lukewarm (saying “he could have been more accurate” is all over the headlines) and I think he’ll probably be forced to resign by tomorrow.
Trump doesn’t seem to realize that he’s not going to satisfy the Dems by giving them a few scalps, and also that easily giving scalps is probably going to make people uneasy about working for him. The Dems want to get rid of Trump, and he’s showing weakness that is emboldening them.
Yeah I read the title and thought “Bull****”
He answered the question he was asked.
Exactly, Sessions was being generous. In the context of the long question about a CNN report no one had seen,and the context of his answer about being a “campaign surrogate” Sessions was completely accurate.
BS