Posted on 02/24/2017 4:42:53 PM PST by BenLurkin
NASA managers said Friday they hope to know within a month or so whether it might be feasible -- or advisable -- to put two astronauts on board the first test flight of a huge 322-foot-tall Space Launch System super booster scheduled for its maiden launch late next year.
The study, requested by the Trump administration, already is underway, but William Hill, deputy associate administrator for Exploration Systems Development at NASA Headquarters, said major technical challenges will need to be resolved, and the agency will need more money to make it happen.
Its going to take a significant amount of money, and money that will be required fairly quickly to implement what we need to do, he told reporters. So its a question of how we refine the funding levels and the phasing of the funding for the next three years and see where it comes out.
If the feasibility study doesnt pan out, he said, we still have a very exciting mission.
The current plan calls for launching a Block 1 SLS rocket in late 2018 -- Exploration Mission 1, or EM-1 -- to boost an unpiloted Orion capsule on a three-week flight beyond the moon and back to a high-speed re-entry and splashdown.
EM-2, featuring an astronaut crew, would be launched atop a Block 1B SLS rocket in the late 2021 timeframe. Unlike the EM-1 rocket, the Block 1B version of the SLS would feature a more powerful, human-rated exploration upper stage, or EUS.
(Excerpt) Read more at cbsnews.com ...
Very exciting....
For the Astronauts?
Don’t put people on cargo ships.
Crew ships should maximize safety. They should be small, and expensive, and safe.
Cargo ships should maximize efficiency. They should be big, cheap, and get the job done.
Could be a setup, send the astronauts to their doom then blame trump...
Shades of how they blamed Ronald Reagan for the Challenger Disaster.
Load it up with illegals and refugees.
IIRC, we did this with the Saturn V.
I’ll volunteer to be their guinea pig. Slingshot me around the moon and back. What weight will I need to be?
And top it off with Muzzy outreaches.
Shades of how they blamed Ronald Reagan for the Challenger Disaster.
...
I’m sure they tried, but I don’t think it’s remembered that way.
I learned the other day that the Shuttle had what should have been a fatal mishap on the first flight. The solid rockets created a shockwave on the pad that bent the body flap way beyond limits and should have broken it. John Young said if he’d known about it, he would have flown to a safe altitude and ejected. But they were lucky and the flap worked, otherwise they wouldn’t have made it through reentry.
Send it up with Obunghole and Schmucky Schumer as crew.
https://www.amazon.com/Challenger-Revealed-Insiders-Administration-Greatest/dp/1560259809
Libtards spared no chances to slam ronnie.
True, but the tested partial stacks of saturn V i think....
The first test of all three stages was manned apollo 8 i think...
That’s a book written many years after the fact (2007) by a Democrat whackadoodle. Read the second editorial which states that the nutbag author used hearsay from an astrologer to support his claim that Reagan was to blame.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.