Posted on 02/21/2017 10:33:48 AM PST by C19fan
Dozens of cinemas across the United States are planning to screen the film adaption of George Orwell’s 1984 in protest of reports that President Donald Trump is allegedly considering cuts to arts funding.
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
Up is down. Freedom is Slavery. It wasn’t Trump who created Newspeak — rather the anti-Trump types. It wasn’t middle-of-the-road politics that Orwell was warning against — it was socialist utopian totalitarians, like the anti-Trumps in the streets and universities.
I don’t think this showing will occur near where I live — the theaters would soon be out of business.
You said that again.
One can only hope that when they see the “2 minutes hate”, they’ll recognize their OWN attitude & behavior.
Is this what you would call irony?
This is a worthwhile movie to see. Richard Burton’s last film. Suzanna Hamilton nekkid. What’s not to like?
Yes they do.
Well they should relate well to the daily 5 minutes of hate
So-called "progressives," (those another writer calls "the protected class"), wherever they are found, portray themselves as the "intellectual" elite, although they appear to be totally bereft of real knowledge or understanding of the great ideas which were the seedbed of Ameria's successful 200-year experiment in liberty.Today's liberals, especially these so-called "progressives," with all of their domination of academia, Hollywood, and Far Left politics, seem to fit into a category described in an essay by T.S. Eliot on Virgil:
"In our time, when men seem more than ever to confuse wisdom with knowledge and knowledge with information and to try to solve the problems of life in terms of engineering, there is coming into existence a new kind of provincialism which perhaps deserves a new name. It is a provincialism not of space but of time--one for which history is merely a chronicle of human devices which have served their turn and have been scrapped, one for which the world is the property solely of the living, a property in which the dead hold no share."(Bold added for emphasis)
Without intellectual anchoring in the enduring ideas which provided the philosophical foundation of America's Declaration of Independence and Constitution, their vain imaginations of superiority only expose their limited world view.
Yet, the America which rose from obscurity to greatness, from crude hoes and axes to putting a man on the moon, and from oppression by King George to a symbol of liberty for millions all over the world--that America provides shelter for them, even as they attempt to "change" her into something unimagined by the Founders.
If they are allowed to succeed in their own little provincial experiment, their posterity never will know the "blessings of Liberty" proclaimed by the Preamble to America's Constitution.
Now would be a good time for conservatives to read Dr. Russell Kirk's "The Conservative Mind, which can be read online, by the way.
In Kirk's last chapter he reviews the works of poets and writers, quoting lines which now seem to bear a striking resemblance to the players who, though rejected by freedom-loving citizens, simply refuse to leave the stage, as if reality is outside their universe of thought.
For instance, in Robert Frost's "A Case for Jefferson," Frost writes of the character Harrison:
"Harrison loves my country too
But wants it all made over new.
. . . .
He dotes on Saturday pork and beans.
But his mind is hardly out of his teens.
With him the love of country means
Blowing it all to smithereens
And having it made over new."Yes, the pseudointellectuals who just left the White House are entrenched in the so-called "mainstream" media and much of the Legislative Branch and fancy themselves "intellectuals."
By their words and actions, however, they display that provinciality Dr. Kirk recalls as having been described by T. S. Eliot (see above) as being one of time and place, having no intellectual grounding in ideas older than their own little experience in dabbling and discussing Mao, Marx, and other theoreticians.
America's written Constitution deserves protectors whose minds are out of their "teens" in terms of their understanding of civilization's long struggle for liberty.
It certainly deserves protectors who do not consider it a "flawed" document because that Constitution does not permit the government it structures to run rough shod over the rights of its "KEEPERS, the People" (Justice Story).
Blasting it "all to smithereens" seemed to be the goal of the Far Left, which recently had control of the Executive and Legislative branches of the government.
Such politicians rely on what they must believe to be the ignorance of the American people when they make such ridiculous claims. They have been outwitted, however, by an increasingly knowledgeable citizenry who are using the miracles of technology to study for themselves ancient and modern writings on the ideas of liberty versus those of tyranny. As Jefferson wisely observed:
"History, by apprising the people of the past, will enable them to judge of the future; it will avail them of the experience of other times and other nations; it will qualify them as judges of the actions and designs of men; it will enable them to know ambition under every disguise it may assume; and knowing it, to defeat its views."
Wow, their memory went down the memory hole.
No kidding!
Actually Hillary voters might make the connection and start supporting Trump
So after weeks of “OMG Trump is totally Hitler, you guise,” now they’re trying to convince everyone he’s communist?
Did the same thing during Reagan.
“Not sure whether to laugh or cry.”
—
Laugh-—they are idiots and are playing this game to make money.
.
One news page notes “These theaters owners also strongly believe in supporting the National Endowment for the Arts and see any attempt to scuttle that program as an attack on free speech and creative expression through entertainment. “
Someone seems very confused: “freedom of speech” does not include compelling others, thru police power of the state via taxation, to pay for that speech.
let’s see....1984.....that was the year Reagan wiped the map with Liberals, right?
Boy do we live in bizarro world. The movie “1984” should have been shown continuously in theatres the previous 8 years.
***Do they truly equate public subsidy with freedom?***
The useful idiots do, the ones pushing this meme completely embrace the hypocrisy because they know that most people have not been taught to think this through. Public education strikes again.
Worth noting (and under-discussed):
John Hurt played the rebel Winston in “1984”, fighting against the power-mad dictator.
John Hurt _also_ played the power-mad dictator in “V for Vendetta” (which was basically “1984” with a happy ending), fighting against the rebel.
In likening themselves to Winston, they fail to note how they’ve mutated into the actor’s other character.
They don’t see themselves in Hunger Games and they won’t see themselves in 1984.
I can’t wait to hear the liberals start quoting 1984. Easily turned back on them.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.