To: nickcarraway
"I recognized, through my eleven years of training and experience as a law enforcement officer, the substance to be some sort of narcotic," the report said."Let's underline this: Part of the usual "testilying" is working in "my XX years of training and experience" early and often, unprompted. And his pretending that his "training and experience" wasn't sufficient to tell the difference between crack -- or meth, when that became the better drug of choice for whatever reason -- isn't "bad faith" in the eyes of the department? The answer is: because we're living in a police state, folks.
18 posted on
02/11/2017 2:41:57 PM PST by
jiggyboy
(Ten percent of poll respondents are either lying or insane)
To: jiggyboy
In this case the officer is a “she.”
To: jiggyboy
"I recognized, through my eleven years of training and experience as a law enforcement officer, the substance to be some sort of narcotic,"Ergo, eleven years of training and experience as a law enforcement officer are worth jack squat in identifying narcotics. Good to know.
20 posted on
02/11/2017 3:20:17 PM PST by
NobleFree
("law is often but the tyrant's will, and always so when it violates the right of an individual")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson