(In my opinion) Silence is complicity
No, but they will soon be denouncing the DOJ and other agencies as the rule of law starts being applied - liberally ;-)
And the Left has been explaining what to do with Nazis...
Doubtful. If anything, they probably agree with this nutjob who wrote this unbelievable op-ed in the school paper defending the violence. Something about us having to check our privilege before condemning violence.
http://www.dailycal.org/2017/02/07/violence-self-defense/
Not only hasn’t any Democrat denounced the riots in Berkley, but the Media hasn’t called on them to do so, nor has it called on Clinton to control her supporters like they did Pres Trump during the campaign when there were fake attacks on “demonstrators” at his rallys.
They wouldn’t do so voluntarily and no one has asked them to do so. And no one will.
On the contrary, one or two have described it as “beautiful”.
‘denounced’?
Not... they are all banking on it!
That’s how screwed up and LOST they are!1
Remember how the Democrats demanded Trump disavow most anyone and anything they didn’t like?
I don’t know why seeings how it was Trump supporters that were rioting. (/sarc)
The Democrats are paying for it. Theyare financing the violence. Total lowlifes.
I haven’t seen or heard ANYONE on the left, including politicians and Hollyweird, denounce the rioting that has occurred either during the primaries, during the time following the election, during the Inaugural, or at Berkley or anywhere else. My bet is that you will NEVER hear any denunciation since all this so-called “resistance” is being bankrolled by Soros/DNC/Clinton Foundation. Plus, the left NEVER disavows its own radicals, no matter what. That is why they welcome with open arms former Black Panthers, Weather Underground, Communists, Socialists of all kinds, no questions asked.
It is only republicans who are forced to grovel, denounce, disavow, and beg forgiveness at every turn.
If it were Trump supporters rioting, EVERY republican office holder would be asked to disavow and condemn them, and they would do it.
Some have called it “a beautiful thing”. Does that count?
Don’t know but there was a headline a few days back where failed VP Candidate Kaine was quoted “I Like the energy” in reference to the Berkeley ‘protests’ which were of course not ‘protests’ but rather violent assaults.
This experience provides me with yet another example of how the real Brownshirts came into power in the 1930’s.
This reminds me of how a group of well dressed, well educated politicians and social leaders can be brought to offering tolerance and even praise of cruel, criminal actions.
Some people are saying that Berkeley Brawl was similar to Kristallnacht.
Not that I am aware of. Maybe some half-hearted weasel press release on how they are concerned etc. all while probably putting most of the Blake in Milo.
“Anybody out there know of any elected democrat anywhere denouncing the rioting and violence at Berkeley? cause I haven’t even seen even one.”
There is no enemy to the left. To hold otherwise would mean applying some kind of a standard of judgment. And to ask “By what standard do you judge?” would tie up the left in all kinds of philosophical and self-contradictory dilemmas.
Prosecute treason, sedition.
The democrats endorse all that stuff, as they have ANYTIME there has been major riots, from the 1960’s forward.
I would offer, as a retort, who can track the sales of KSG shotguns, and AGUILA half-shotshells?
(I would say ‘UTS’, but my favorite demonstrator of such things, ‘hickok45’, had more success with the KSG over the ‘UTS’.)