But my biggest question is for those Global Warming proponents who state "the science is settled".
How does this new information fit into their reasoning?
Surely something of this nature would be a notable variable in any GW model.
Plus, the author should know the difference between an atom (headline) and an ion (body of article).
Big difference. And better info at link in article.
Unless it's not...
What if the moon decides to retaliate?!?!
Happens every time Michael Moore opens his mouth.
TRUMP’S FAULT!!
(Come on. You KNOW it’ll happen)
;-)
Good thing we have excess CO2 so plants can make more oxygen to replace all the oxygen that has escaped to the moon for the past 2.4 BILLION years.
If we're bombarding the moon with Oxygen, what are we gonna do when we run out? And why not send Nitrogen anyway?
ML/NJ
Personally, I think some Japanese researchers are bombarding us with horse manure even as we speak.
I’m definitely feeling the effects of it as long as I keep reading the article; so I think I’ll stop.
I think most people would be surprised to learn that the space station orbits within the Earth’s atmosphere. I don’t think we can yet say the same about the Moon.