Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 01/11/2017 5:55:37 AM PST by IBD editorial writer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: IBD editorial writer

The Federal Government has NO BUSINESS being involved in our elections at the State level. Our system of Government was set up the way it was for a reason. We have 50 STATES for a reason


2 posted on 01/11/2017 5:59:36 AM PST by 48th SPS Crusader (I am an American. Not a Republican or a Democrat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: IBD editorial writer

Trump will overturn it.


3 posted on 01/11/2017 5:59:42 AM PST by FrdmLvr ("A is A. A thing is what it is." Ayn Rand)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: IBD editorial writer

I’m divided. I do support states rights and I do see elections as a state issue, so I do think Obama is out of line, as usual.

But I also do want to see photo IDs required in elections, and purple ink, and voter roll purges, and mandatory penalties for voter fraud.


4 posted on 01/11/2017 6:05:45 AM PST by ClearCase_guy (Abortion is what slavery was: immoral but not illegal. Not yet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: IBD editorial writer

Oh no. We can’t have that! President Trump will correct this.


5 posted on 01/11/2017 6:06:04 AM PST by jch10 (President Trump, President Trump, President Trump! I just love saying that!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: IBD editorial writer; All

The solution to voter fraud is — Any federal election MUST require a VALID ID that requires proof of citizenship in order to obtain/cast a ballot.

If states wish to continue this BS for local elections fine, but any election that involves a candidate for federal office will at a minimum require a VALID ID that requires proof of citizenship in order to obtain/cast a ballot.

The NEW and IMPROVED Department of Homeland Security Secretary, Retired Marine General John Kelly can UN-F this. And as soon as we get a replacement for Justice Scalia the Supreme Court can make it the LAW.

Elections BETTER have consequences...Otherwise, why vote!?!


9 posted on 01/11/2017 6:12:22 AM PST by areukiddingme1 (areukiddingme1 is a synonym for a Retired U.S. Navy Chief Petty Officer and tired of liberal BS.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: IBD editorial writer

So now we know why this incessant harping about the Russians. What if this was all part of the set up to get Americans to accept the federal government, DHS, to step in and take control of elections and away from states? What if?


10 posted on 01/11/2017 6:14:34 AM PST by Obadiah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: IBD editorial writer
Homeland Security chief Jeh Johnson

Another black mark against the worst eight years in our presidential history.

11 posted on 01/11/2017 6:19:35 AM PST by tomkat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: IBD editorial writer

I like the term “critical infrastructure”, because in the right hands, it can be justification for any number of improvements, such as:

1) National Voter ID. We keep being told that there is no voter fraud problem. Our answer now: “Maybe so, but since voting is now CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE we must be absolutely sure that there never can be voter fraud in the future.”

2) Proof of Citizenship to Register to vote, and in-person Registration. We keep being told that Illegals don’t vote. Our answer now: “Maybe so, but since voting is now CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE we must be absolutely sure that Illegals will always be prevented from voting in the future.”

Lots more related.

I think we’ve just been handed a gift. The problem is that our side probably won’t figure it out.


12 posted on 01/11/2017 6:20:44 AM PST by BobL (In Honor of the NeverTrumpers, I declare myself as FR's first 'Imitation NeverTrumper')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: IBD editorial writer

By declaring elections “critical infrastructure” homeland security can say they must be “gun free zones”.

Some states ban guns at polling places. Others do not.

The practice seems to have started with the New York Sullivan act, designed to disarm political foes while allowing the Tammany gang to keep its enforcers armed.


14 posted on 01/11/2017 6:23:21 AM PST by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: IBD editorial writer

On His Way Out, Obama Moves To Make National Elections Less Secure

Say bye, bye
To the turd in a tie.


15 posted on 01/11/2017 6:28:02 AM PST by JayAr36 (Lets just reneame the Democrats to DRATS. I think the description is accurate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: IBD editorial writer

Here’s more of that smooth transition.


16 posted on 01/11/2017 6:32:43 AM PST by bgill (From the CDC site, "We don't know how people are infected with Ebola")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: IBD editorial writer

...and yet another way in which the so-called Patriot Act (which is anything BUT patriotic) is being used to subvert the Constitution.


18 posted on 01/11/2017 6:52:03 AM PST by ManHunter (You can run, but you'll only die tired... Army snipers: Reach out and touch someone)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: IBD editorial writer

With almost no notice sounds like his next job will be with the media.


20 posted on 01/11/2017 10:35:02 AM PST by Vaduz (women and children to be impacted the most.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson