Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Manly Warrior

The constitutionality of that list is not my point. I personally think it should be unconstitutional for our gubmint to keep a secret list like this, but apparently I am wrong on this as the secret “no fly” list not only exists but has hundreds of American citizens on it along with thousands of foreigners. My point is that since we have such a list with people that are on it by mistake or for much weaker reasons, this guy should have definitely been on it as soon as he told the FBI that he was being forced to fight for ISIS. I wonder how many other people in the country the FBI knows are probably dangerous and more or less leaves alone?

http://www.foxnews.com/travel/2015/09/09/8-ways-can-end-up-on-no-fly-list.html


30 posted on 01/07/2017 6:49:57 PM PST by jospehm20
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]


To: jospehm20

That’s just it, if the FBI “knows” that someone is dangerous, then they need to investigate, charge or commit as the case may be (lawful adjudication via due process), but no star chamber actions in my country thank you, even if it “works” to prevent a crime.

No compromise on our rights and due process.

Yes, I am a bit stubborn on this topic.


31 posted on 01/08/2017 4:29:50 AM PST by Manly Warrior (US ARMY (Ret), "No Free Lunches for the Dogs of War")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson