Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Candor7

One “L” in “Marshals”, Candor.

and I can assure you, the criminal processing specialist in the office had the detainer.


48 posted on 01/08/2017 8:22:47 AM PST by military cop (I carry a .45....cause they don't make a .46....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]


To: military cop

If they had the detainer, itis not a matter of record. Why had the judge not taken notice of it? The judge did not remand Bundy into the custo0dy of the Marshals, they simoply grabbed him.

Was kity then that the prosecutor had not presented the detainer to the judge?

That’s why Mumford was objecting, as he was professionally required to do.The judge had no jurisdiction of record to remand Bundy into federal custody.

And Mumford should not have been arrested in court, there was no contempt finding, Bundy was not a fugitive, and Mumford was being an advocate.

Simply jack booted thugism in a venue where due process is the rule. And you can bet that the US Marshals will pay for it, personally if need be.False arrest, false imprisonment, kidnapping, violation of the Constitutional right of due process. Its easily a multi million dollar civil case.

And I can hardly wait to watch them pay.


50 posted on 01/08/2017 10:28:08 AM PST by Candor7 ( Obama fascism article:(http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/05/barack_obama_the_quintessentia_1.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson