Posted on 12/24/2016 7:21:38 AM PST by Extremely Extreme Extremist
SACRAMENTO, Calif. (AP) Californias attorney general said Friday that she was pursuing new pimping charges against the operators of Backpage.com, a website that advertises escort services, just two weeks after a judge tossed an earlier case.
Kamala Harris, an incoming U.S. senator, said she has charged Backpage executives Carl Ferrer, Michael Lacey and James Larkin with 13 counts of pimping and conspiracy to commit pimping. They also are charged with 26 counts of money laundering.
(Excerpt) Read more at dfw.cbslocal.com ...
Dang, I was hoping this was about bloggers.
Fake love...
These liberal nut jobs in CA are perfectly fine aborting a 9 mo baby in the womb because it’s “a woman’s right to choose what to do with her own body”, but apparently having sex for money is NOT a woman’s right to choose what to do with her own body. I don’t get it?
“These liberal nut jobs in CA are perfectly fine aborting a 9 mo baby in the womb because its a womans right to choose what to do with her own body, but apparently having sex for money is NOT a womans right to choose what to do with her own body. I dont get it?”
Basically, someone in the administration used Backpage, got burned and is now seeking revenge to cover his/her tracks.
Men get pleasure from sex. California can’t stand that idea.
Like the war on drugs, the organized criminal enterprise that owns the liberal politicians, corrupt judges and law enforcement, WANT to keep certain things illegal in order to use the government to protect their permanent monopoly.
Besides, how will black ops get their black budget money?
Apparently the Backstage executives were not financially
generous enough with regard to political contributions.
Why does any sentence with the word “pimping” appear hilarious.
“Conspiracy to commit pimping.” That’s comedy gold there.
>
“...said she has charged Backpage executives...with 13 counts of pimping and conspiracy to commit pimping.”
>
Yo, ho. A pimp’s got to pimp!
Kidding aside, when do We get a few office holders on Oaths of Office and conspiracy to deprive Citizens of their Right(s)??
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.