Posted on 12/17/2016 11:05:12 AM PST by BobL
One look at world history will show you that no country with a diverse population of different races, languages, and religion has long survived. Countries dont naturally form with a diverse population, and when in the past theyve occurred its usually been as a result of armed conquest, as was India.
These unnaturally formed countries have either melded together into a single population made up of one mixed race with one language and one religion or theyve come apart, and theyve usually come apart with extreme violence. The longer these diverse populations were forced to coexist with one another without mixing and becoming one, the more the hatred grew among them and the more violently they broke apart, but break apart they did, or genocide has settled the issue once and for all.
One way or the other, India will either become completely Muslim, or it will become completely Hindu, but there is little possibility of India maintaining the current mixture indefinitely.
I’m in Dehli now. Incredible.
Agreed.
The vaunted Gandhi and Churchill were wrong.
Consider this. Indians and Pakistanis/Bangladeshis are the same “race” with similar history, language etc., etc. The only difference is religion. Yet I have heard of no country that has a problem with Indian immigrants (save perhaps Fiji). Pakistanis/Bangladeshis on the other hand are labeled in Britain as ‘Asians’ and are the ones that have the rape gangs and the no-go areas. I have to wonder why that is.
I thought genocide was an ethnic cleansing act. My guess is that people in Bangladesh share much of the same genomes found in India. I think the killing is more along the "religious" lines, if one can find Islam counts as a religion. The Muslims brought this on themselves with their historic brutality of Infidels.
I thought genocide was an ethnic cleansing act. My guess is that people in Bangladesh share much of the same genomes found in India. I think the killing is more along the "religious" lines, if one can find Islam counts as a religion. The Muslims brought this on themselves with their historic brutality of Infidels.
I thought genocide was an ethnic cleansing act. My guess is that people in Bangladesh share much of the same genomes found in India. I think the killing is more along the "religious" lines, if one can find Islam counts as a religion. The Muslims brought this on themselves with their historic brutality of Infidels.
And Pakistan and India are separated by a huge and very effective border fence, a wall if you will, for the entire length of their borders.
But I guess you already know this:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2033886/India-Pakistan-border-visible-space.html
I’d have to go with Fred here. Partition, as bad as it was, was inevitable. Look at the kind of trouble India has had with Jammu and Kashmir, its only Muslim majority state. You’d have to multiply that by a factor of four or five if India stayed undivided (Hyderabad, Bengal, Punjab, Junagadh spring to mind).
Kissinger was definitely not the great diplomat he was supposed to be
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.