Posted on 12/11/2016 5:17:54 AM PST by GrandJediMasterYoda
Russian Interference Could Give Courts Legal Authority To Install Clinton
A 1995 federal court ruling out of Pennsylvania may offer some clues to Clinton supporters as to possible legal authority for removing an elected official from office and replacing them with their erstwhile opponent.
In light of late-breaking reports Friday evening that Russians interfered with the 2016 presidential election to assist Donald Trump’s victory, Clinton supporters are furiously in pursuit of remedies.
At 10:45 p.m. Friday evening, the Washington Post broke an explosive story alleging that Russians had interfered with the 2016 presidential election in order to assist Donald Trump in a victory over democratic candidate Hillary Clinton. The story reveals that a CIA assessment detailing this conclusion had been presented to President Obama and top congressional leaders last week.
(Excerpt) Read more at huffingtonpost.com ...
“Those of you that know me will have heard me say (see me write, technically) often that I GD hate Putin. I think he’s scum, I hate his guts, I’m the last guy here who will be a Putin apologist, >>but the democrat party and everyone involved with it is the much greater threat to MY life and well being<<. I don’t live in Europe, I live here. Putin didn’t just pass a huge tax on pop (soda), my local democrat county dictator/official state sanctioned looter did.”
YES!!! Say it LOUD!!! TRUTH^^!!!
The comments at the HuffPo site are FaceBook. Everyone who is on FB should have at it, back at these lefties.
Quite a few already are, it appears :)
How about blatant Saudin interference to elect Illiarily!
Saudi Arabia Has Funded 20% Of Hillary’s Presidential Campaign, Saudi Crown Prince Claims
Zerohedge ^ | Jun 14, 2016 3:57 AM | Tyler Durden
Posted on 12/12/2016, 5:13:23 AM by xzins
As a reminder, It is illegal in the United States for foreign countries to try to influence the outcome of elections by funding candidates. That appears not to have stopped the Saudis, however.
“Saudi Arabia always has sponsored both Republican and Democratic Party of America and in America current election also provide with full enthusiasm 20 percent of the cost of Hillary Clinton’s election even though some events in the country don’t have a positive look to support the king of a woman (sic) for presidency,” the report quoted Prince Mohammed as having said.
According to the US Federal Election commission, over the past two years Clinton has raised a little more than $211.8 million. 20% of this sum is $42.4 million.
The report was published (and then mysteriously deleted) on the eve of Prince Mohammed making an official visit to the United States. The Saudi Press Agency reported on Monday that the senior royal was due to fly to Washington where he will meet officials to discuss US-Saudi ties.
He will remain in the American capital until 16 June, when he will travel to New York for meetings with financial companies, the Saudi Gazette reported.
Prince Mohammed will discuss regional issues with American officials, and he will hold talks with the financial companies about his vision for diversifying Saudi Arabia’s economy away from oil dependency.
Links between Saudi Arabia and the Clinton family, including with Hillary’s campaign, are well reported. In 2008, it was revealed that the Gulf kingdom had donated between $10m and $25m to the Clinton Foundation, a charity set up by Hillary’s husband and former US President Bill Clinton.
Last year the Centre for Studies and Media Affairs at the Saudi Royal Court paid public relations firm the Podesta Group $200,000 for a month-long project to provide “public relations services”.
The Podesta Group was founded in 1988 by brothers John and Tony Podesta. John Podesta is the chair of Hillary Clinton’s campaign to become the next US president.
snip
The report was later deleted and the news agency has not responded to requests for comment from Middle East Eye. However, the deletion took place too late, as the Washington-based Institute for Gulf Affairs managed to capture the report and has re-published the original Arabic Petra report, which quoted Prince Mohammed as having said Saudi Arabia had provided with “full enthusiasm” an undisclosed amount of money to Clinton.
” CONCLUSION The voters decide US elections-—not hackers and leakers — that Debbie Wasserman Schultz and John Podesta said nasty things about Bernie Sanders did not decide the election as much as it indicted the Democrat apparat.
That’s the thing they’re fuming about-—being outed.
The shamed Dems take on a Sisyphiam task to clear their name——its not going to work. “
Yep, it in a nutshell.....I must admit I’m having fun watching these reprobates make utter fools of themselves : )
At the same time Hillary, her husband, her daughter, the Clinton Foundation, her campaign manager (and presumably Obama) were swilling at the Saudi trough, these "tolerant and compassionate Democrats" knew that in Saudi Arabia, homemsexuals are considered criminals and are thrown off buildings; a place where women and minorities have no rights whatsoever....women cannot even drive cars in S/A.
LOL!!
At some point in the future we're going to have to stop feeling glee about democrat misery. I'm thinking next year around this time...maybe the year after.
I promise to stop the glee Nov2020, when Trump is re-elected. I don’t want to be known as greedy.
You're forgiven...
I see Gunzbuggy has been broadcasting Walsh’s twitters. Can you say, “Useful idiot ?” If Russia/Putin helped in saving this country from the likes of the Butcheress, I say, “THANK YOU !”
I wanna slap Walsh and the other morons. They are like Westworld bots, following the (dem written) narrative. Screw the narrative.
Agreed.
This won’t happen.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.