That was my point. Researchers keep trying to find medical reasons for fetal stem cells and they have not yet found a breakthrough. But they sure do like to base experiments on fetal tissues.
Meanwhile, adult stem cells have contributed to many breakthroughs. Good stuff, and no one gets harmed.
But the journalists now refer to “stem cells” and “adult cells”. They try to conflate the two while hiding the moral problems of fetal stem cells by just saying “stem cell” or “adult stem cell”. They avoid saying “fetal” or “embryonic” and they avoid it for a reason. It’s bad PR.
Ah. Got ya.