Posted on 12/04/2016 8:14:06 AM PST by MtnClimber
Comrade, your statement is factually incorrect. Yes, it is. But it is politically correct.
The notion of political correctness came into use among Communists in the 1930s as a semi-humorous reminder that the Partys interest is to be treated as a reality that ranks above reality itself. Because all progressives, Communists included, claim to be about creating new human realities, they are perpetually at war against natures laws and limits. But since reality does not yield, progressives end up pretending that they themselves embody those new realities. Hence, any progressive movements nominal goal eventually ends up being subordinated to the urgent, all-important question of the movements own power. Because that power is insecure as long as others are able to question the truth of what the progressives say about themselves and the world, progressive movements end up struggling not so much to create the promised new realities as to force people to speak and act as if these were real: as if what is correct politicallyi.e., what thoughts serve the partys interestwere correct factually.
Communist states furnish only the most prominent examples of such attempted groupthink. Progressive parties everywhere have sought to monopolize educational and cultural institutions in order to force those under their thumbs to sing their tunes or to shut up. But having brought about the opposite of the prosperity, health, wisdom, or happiness that their ideology advertised, they have been unable to force folks to ignore the gap between political correctness and reality.
(Excerpt) Read more at independent.org ...
fo l8r
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.