Khalid Sheikh Mohammed: Destroy the US Through Immigration and Welfare

9/11 mastermind Khalid Sheikh Mohammed advocated destroying the US from within by abusing its liberal welfare and immigration laws (Wikimedia).

Khalid Sheikh Mohammed may be the most successful terrorist mastermind in history. The Pakistani Islamic fundamentalist and al-Qaeda member was the brains behind the 9/11 attacks which killed 2,996 people and injured thousands more. In a groundbreaking new book called Enhanced Interrogation, CIA contractor James Mitchell provides insightful analysis into his relationship with Mohammed, and the ideology that he espoused.

Perhaps the most interesting point gleaned from the book is Mohammed’s ultimate plan to destroy the US from within. In his mind, terrorist attacks, bombings, and mass shootings were not the practical path to instituting sharia law in the United States. Rather, he envisioned taking down the US from within through use of the nation’s liberal immigration and welfare policies.

He envisioned a future where jihadis could enter the United States, live like leeches off of government benefits, breed like rabbits, bring their like minded relatives from abroad, not work, and be paid by the US government to wage jihad and aim to institute sharia law.

We are not at war today with Muslims. We are at war with a faction of Muslims who seek to impose a radical form of politicized Islam on the entire world.

I have never been more happy that Donald Trump is about to take over the presidency to put a stop to the outrage. Taking in “refugees” from Syria, Iraq, Afghanistan, or Somalia, poses a clear and present danger to the safety of Americans, and it is virtually impossible to adequately screen them. But the American Left is in La La Land when it comes to the dangers posed by radical jihadism, Salafism, and Wahhabism. To the American Left, saying anything about the potential perils of accepting refugees from incredibly dangerous conflict zones is Islamophobia, not common sense.

But we have Donald Trump in the White House now. No longer will we have a “PC Principal” president who is afraid to even use the term “Islamic terrorism”. No longer will we be slaves to political correctness. No longer will we tolerate a laissez-faire attitude towards those who would do us incredible harm. And no longer will we fund on the backs of hardworking taxpayers, the very individuals who seek to institute sharia law in the United States.

As a recent study demonstrates, 91.4% of Middle Eastern refugees are currently on food stamps, 73.1% are on Medicaid, and an outrageous 68.3% are on cash welfare. In an era when so many Americans are struggling financially, when we have high levels of poverty in our inner cities, when our education system is falling behind based on international metrics, and when our infrastructure is tired and dated, why is it a priority to bring in refugees from the Middle East, the vast majority of whom do not share our values?

Muslims in the United States have every right to be here, provided they follow the law, believe in our values and our Constitution, and behave as good citizens. The United States has offered a haven for religious tolerance and diversity for well over two centuries. When Donald Trump proposed a blanket ban on Muslim immigration, that was both wrong and unconstitutional.

As Kentucky Senator Rand Paul pointed out, why make the matter just about religion? Why penalize Kazakhs, Azerbaijanis, Malays, Albanians, or Indonesians? The Muslim world is wide and diverse and it simply does not make sense to impose a blanket ban on a quarter of the world’s population. What does, however, make a lot of sense is temporarily imposing a ban on immigration from places where the threat of terrorism is significant: primarily Syria, Iraq, Somalia, Sudan, Yemen, and Afghanistan.

Places where radical ideology is rampant. Places where huge segments of the population despise the United States, Great Britain, France, Israel, and their allies. Places where the murder of homosexuals or transgenders is a laughing matter. Where honor killing is par for the course. Where female genital mutilation is considered normal. Where imposing sharia law and waging jihad are more important objectives than earning an honest living. Where it is acceptable, or even encouraged, to kill those who do not agree with fundamentalistradical Sunni Islam.

This is not a laughing matter. It is not paranoia. Neither is it a matter of Islamophobia. This is a matter of reality. The dangers are real, and the American Left is doing us no favors by trying to sugarcoat radical Islam in warm, fuzzy, tolerance and diversity.

As I repeatedly point out, the taxpayers of Massachusetts are just as responsible for “state-sponsored terrorism” as the governments of Syria and Iran. Perhaps even more so, because we actually have a democratic voice in the matter.

We should always remember that the Tsarnaev brothers were the ultimate incarnation of Khalid Sheikh Mohammed’s dream: welfare cheats and deadbeats who lived like leeches off of hardworking Massachusetts taxpayers, never worked an honest day in their lives, and used their outrageously generous “welfare” benefits to build the pressure cooker bombs that murdered and maimed hundreds of Bostonians.

Texas Muslim-—Serial Killer of Christians-—on Disability and Food Stamps, had Diamonds and 200 Credit Cards Hidden on Texas property

Front Page Magazine | 6/20/2014 | Daniel Greenfield / FR Posted by Dqban22

This sort of thing is surprisingly common among Muslims -very few seem to have jobs but they drive around in luxury cars and are well-dressed and fed. The only reason this case came to light is because the Texas Muslim refugee committed two murders in Texas, one of which he actually got away with.

The murder of Christian believer, Gelareh Bagherzadeh, was reported earlier. Gelareh Bagherzadeh was an Iranian Christian who came to this country only to be murdered by a Muslim because she encouraged his daughter to marry the man she loved.

The Texas Muslim claimed he was too disabled to work. But he wasn’t too disabled to kill.

BACKSTORY The Texan, a strict Muslim, was furious when his Jordanian-American daughter married a man without his permission. The Muslim, Ali Mahwood-Awad Irsan, blamed his daughters husband, relatives say. They say he also faulted one of her closest friends, 30-year-old Gelareh Bagherzadeh, a Christian convert who widely denounced Islam.

<><> First Christian-believer Bagherzadeh was killed, gunned down outside her parents Texas Galleria townhouse complex in January 2012.

<><> Eleven months later, Irsan’s son-in-law died after being shot multiple times in northwest Texas, in the Harris County apartment he shared with his wife.

The Texas Muslim thought he could get away with murdering because he had already gotten away with so many other things in Texas.

Federal authorities executed a search warrant at Irsan’s sprawling, 5-acre property 40 miles north of Houston, where they allegedly found cash, diamonds, pearls, weapons and phony passports hidden in attic rafters, in secret compartments throughout a cluster of trailers and outbuildings and even inside the buried drum of a clothes dryer at the Conroe, Texas property.

The Muslim Irsan, his wife Shmou Ali Alrawabdeh, and another daughter were subsequently arrested on a variety of federal fraud charges and are in federal custody.

A federal criminal complaint detailing the discoveries recounts a saga of nearly 20 years in which the 57-year-old naturalized citizen from Jordan, and his family, allegedly scammed taxpayer disability assistance funds claiming “fibromyalgia and chronic fatigue symptoms,” and “affective disorders” while secreting real estate, vehicles and cash in US and foreign bank accounts.

The complaint also alleges the Muslim Irsan:

<><> was receiving taxpayer funds for a son not living in the US,

<><> maintained several addresses on the property to facilitate various schemes, and,

<><> once disabled a safety feature on a saw then purposefully cut himself to receive a $75,000 settlement.

The Muslim Ali was certainly industrious and entrepreneurial, just not quite in the way amnesty advocates like to claim.

Also found on the property was a makeshift gun range, which witnesses said “five or six Muslim families” frequently visited to fire AK-47s and information about Irsan’s attempts to get a silencer. Nothing to do with Islam I’m sure.

The rest of the scam ...... While there have been no allegations of terrorist ties regarding the Muslim familys alleged (a) foreign bank accounts, and, (b) suspicious wire transactions, Irsan’s strict adherence to radical Islam may have been a motive in the alleged murders.

Authorities are also re-examining a 1999 case in which Irsan was not indicted after claiming self-defense in the shooting of son-in-law Amjad Alidam, who was married to Nasemah Rachelle Irsan.

Prosecutors also revealed, in connection to the social security fraud and credit card charges against Irsan, that they found more than 200 credit cards with various names and multiple variations of his own name throughout the home.

Arresting officers say they also found more than 40 similar credit cards in his wallet the morning he was arrested. His daughter also alleges, among multiple other schemes detailed in court documents, that Ali Irsan purposely disabled the safety device on a Ryobi rotary saw and purposely cut his own foot. Prosecutors say he used that injury to receive a $75,000 settlement from the manufacturer.

http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dgreenfield/muslim-killer-on-disability-and-food-stamps-had-diamonds-and-200-credit-cards/print/

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.