There has to be an idiot particle. Nothing else provides a scientific explanation for clinton voters.
Our best and brightest struggle to grasp what God has wrought.....much good science and inventions have come of it but we are probably just scratching the surface of what He did by speaking it all into existence.
Seems if you think wind, water, soil, and fire are the only elements, and, therefore, the only things used in experiments, then the only conclusions are those must be the only elements.
We are using only particles and properties that we know. When we discover more, we’ll add more and get different results.
I heard Neil DeGrasse (yeah, I know) say that scientists understand about 15% of what happens on Earth and about 10% of what occurs in the universe. I am curious, if this is true, that anyone can say anything about science with absolute certainty, like climate change and the causes are absolute. I wouldn’t bet a horse with those sort of odds.
Very interesting summary. Thanks for posting.
I’m always a little suspicious when tests and experiments show us exactly what we expected to see. Makes me wonder if the experiment is unintentionally skewed. I’m not saying I think it is. Just that if it were my experiment, I’d be checking and re-checking and looking for independent verification.
God may not be the next explanation but He will always be the Final Explanation.
Everything in the so called universe is a projection of the Ego. It doesn’t exist at all unless perceived.
The Higg's Boson, for example, was postulated to exist as a field or matrix that all other 'things' exist within (sort of) to impart mass within this space.
Previously, I thought of it as various boats and things in a lake. The boats all cause displacement, due to volume and mass (surface objects). The water itself has nothing to due with the mass/volume of the objects or the displacement caused by the objects. the water "allows" for the observation of those characteristics.
This is a simple model with a number of things eliminated (density of water for example) but using it, when you extend the model past the basic description of the Higg's Field, you come up against walls or other possibilities, like postulations of Super Symmetry.
Gravity, does it propitiate, within space-time, like observable events (say, light)? And I've not been able (could be just me) to see how quantum states of particles, in particular, entanglement are addressed.