How is early voting legal and constitutional?
Not only does it violate "the day" does it not also violate The 14th amendment whereas, I a resident of Michigan may only vote on "the day" or via absentee with excuse. And, voters in 34 states may vote as much as 45 days in advance with no excuse:
http://www.ncsl.org/research/elections-and-campaigns/absentee-and-early-voting.aspx
The date on which early voting begins may be as early as 45 days before the election, or as late as the Friday before the election. The average starting time for early voting across all 34 states is 22 days before the election. Early voting typically ends just a few days before Election Day: seven days before the election in two states, on the Thursday before the election in one state, the Friday before in eight states, the Saturday before in seven states, and the Monday before Election Day in 13 states. Early voting periods range in length from four days to 45 days; the average across all 33 states is 19 days. Of the states that allow early in-person voting, 22 and the District of Columbia allow some weekend early voting. Saturday: 18 states + the District of Columbia provide for voting on Saturday. 4 additional states (California, Kansas, Vermont and Massachusetts) leave it up to county clerks who may choose to allow Saturday voting. Sunday: 4 states (Alaska, Illinois, Ohio and Maryland) allow for Sunday voting. 5 states (California, Florida, Georgia, Nevada and Massachusetts) leave it up to county clerks who may choose to be open on Sundays.
The usual explanation is that the day that shall be the same is the day that Electors give their votes at the various state capitals, so that states can’t hold back and see how other states’ Electors decided before making their own decisions.
Congress may determine the time *generally* when Electors are chosen, but in accordance with the original Constitution deferring to states much of the time, states can determine their own reasonable details.
I would certainly be in favor of a one-day only vote nationwide.
The Kenyanesian Usurpation was brought to you by BOTH parties.
The Constitution says natural born citizen.
That means one who is naturally an American because they couldn’t be anything else, born here of citizen parents.
Everyone in DC wanted that changed without the hassle of amending the Constitution.
The Senate passed a resolution declaring McCain a natural born citizen because he had TWO citizen parents, even though he was born in Panama.
Then Obama runs and wins based on just being born here, even though he told us on his website he was born a British subject.
So the standard went from born here of citizen parents to just TWO citizen parents to just being born here in one election cycle without amending the Constitution.
According to this standard the recently deceased King of Thailand was eligible, he was born in Cambridge MA.
This was done intentionally because Rubio (no citizen parents), Cruz (foreign birth, one citizen parent), Jindal (no citizen parents), and Haley (no citizen parents) were all ineligible and the future of the GOP.
The truth of the Kenyanesian Usurpation will never see the light of day because they all cooperated in the violation of the Constitution.
The RATS don’t need no stinking Constitution.
They let the Kenyan off from NBC requirements. They let Hellary off for violating 18 U.S. Code § 2071.