Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Pilgrim's Progress

“Don’t mean to be argumentative, but 0bama’s birth status was also put up for the court of public opinion...”

Yes it was, and as you recall, Obama produced a document that satisfied enough people, that the matter was put to rest before election day.

Later, it was discovered that there were all sorts of problems with the document, but by that time it was too late. He’d gotten away with it.

The case with Hillary violating the law concerning prtection of sensitive government information, is very different. Comey got up in front of the American people and admitted that she violated every word of part (a) of the statute.

It doesn’t matter what he said thereafter, because part (b) of the statute says that any government employee who violates it, is subject to part (b).

Now people can argue that this needs to be adjudicated in a court of law to find her guilty, but that’s not true. The people themselves are completely capable of reviewing the facts, and deciding that she should not hold public office again.

The key to this is getting the conversation started. Trump can do that by reading the text of the statute at every rally, and asking his supporters to flood social media with it.


77 posted on 10/15/2016 4:54:09 PM PDT by Windflier (Pitchforks and torches ripen on the vine. Left too long, they become black rifles.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies ]


To: Windflier

And I believe that this is, in fact, what is occurring. The American media may not be interested in the crimes and misdemeanors of Hillary Clinton, but the American people surely are. This is why we are seeing reports of upwards or more of a million democrats have come to Trump.

I am confident that this election is going to be much different than the way the media is portraying it.


79 posted on 10/15/2016 4:59:23 PM PDT by Pilgrim's Progress (http://www.baptistbiblebelievers.com/BYTOPICS/tabid/335/Default.aspx D)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies ]

To: Windflier

Well. I’m not on social media unless FR counts. But, I actively yak politix to any warm body that will let me including the dogs and cats. I’ve copied and pasted the statutes you cite to have with me. Now tell me the source of those statutes please.


84 posted on 10/15/2016 5:12:39 PM PDT by Wneighbor (Deplorable, livin in a swamp of crazy and lovin it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies ]

To: Windflier

Well. I’m not on social media unless FR counts. But, I actively yak politix to any warm body that will let me including the dogs and cats. I’ve copied and pasted the statutes you cite to have with me. Now tell me the source of those statutes please.


85 posted on 10/15/2016 5:12:42 PM PDT by Wneighbor (Deplorable, livin in a swamp of crazy and lovin it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson