“True but until there is due process & a conviction. Its just “interesting news”.”
No, it’s a truly effective weapon, if properly deployed by the Trump campaign.
Throwing this statute in the Clinton camp’s faces would put them on defense, and prompt the American people to join the debate.
So what, if the other side makes the same argument you’re making? Who cares? The point is to make them defend the idea that laws don’t apply to her, which is how that argument comes off — especially since the Director of the FBI has already stated that she committed the acts which are proscribed by the statute at issue.
You must imagine how a successful prosecution in the court of public opinion will look to the voters. That is ALL that matters at this point.
That’s fighting it in the “court of public opinion” and I agree with Trump doing that! I want actual due process in a court and justice done. The only way that happens is if Trump wins, and say a Giuliani is AG. I wasn’t dismissing it as unimportant when I said “interesting news” , however he loses and that’s what it will be. Interesting and quickly forgotten news!