[Wneighbor]

This isn't about the basic constitutional requirements for eligibility. Don't confuse that with the issue at hand. She's guilty of having violated the above statute while she was an officer of the government, so is therefore LEGALLY ineligible to hold federal office again - per the statute.

At present, the question isn't IF she is eligible under the statute, but WHO will enforce that statute?

This seems akin to Zero's birth issue. There is no one who will take the authority to enforce. Congress won't do it, comey won't do it. It's up to the electorate.

I am entirely open to suggestion here.

[Windflier]

“This seems akin to Zero’s birth issue. There is no one who will take the authority to enforce. Congress won’t do it, comey won’t do it. It’s up to the electorate.”

Precisely.

It’s the people who must adjudicate this matter, and what a perfect opportunity to do so.

Trump should begin every rally by reading the text of the statute out loud to the assembled. He should then tell them all to copy and paste it from his website and flood social media with it.

Force Hillary and her minions to defend her illegal run for office. Make them explain to to the American people that part (b) of the statute doesn’t apply to her, even though James Comey said that she violated every word of part (a).

Trump already said in the last debate that she should be in jail. Well, here’s the exact letter of the law that he can use to fight this in the court of public opinion.