Posted on 10/14/2016 8:38:52 AM PDT by doug from upland
FReepers --- I got this to Gowdy's investigators one year ago and to FBI and Justice Dept early this year. I've tried to get it to media outlets but they are not playing it.
Hillary again lied in her sworn responses to Judicial Watch, saying that the server was for convenience. Absolutely false! It was to hide information because she was afraid of investigations.
PLEASE SEND THIS TO EVERYONE YOU KNOW AND TO MEDIA OUTLETS. Trump should use this but they have not responded to me. This clip was in a 20/20 piece just over a decade ago when ABC licensed this and other clips but hardly anyone is apparently aware of it.
Any way to get a TRANSCRIPT for us cubicle-bound?
Daily Mail or Ambrose Evans-Pritchard? The latter might enjoy a last shot at her. I might have a way of contacting him a bit more direct than via e-mail. Will see what I can do.
A decade or so ago 20/20 did a story on the crimes in her 2000 Senate campaign, which was the subject of my film, HILLARY! UNCENSORED. ABC licensed some of Peter Paul’s private videos. I acquired all of the video rights from him.
ABC used this clip but it was over a decade ago so very few people have paid attention.
The motivation for the server is clear. She was afraid of investigations. Without a private server and the ability to delete, the government would have all her emails and she could not have deleted them.
Here is the 20/20 video.
Hillary Campaign Frauds Exposed by Peter Paul on ABC 20/20
Thanks. I attended the trial of her campaign finance chairman, David Rosen. It was totally fixed as we showed in HILLARY! UNCENSORED.
Exactly so...paper files were so bulky back in the whitewater, rose law firm and travel gate days. Emails are so much easier to get rid of..ping for later
Clintons have had plenty of practice covering their trail
Exactly so...paper files were so bulky back in the whitewater, rose law firm and travel gate days. Emails are so much easier to get rid of..ping for later
Clintons have had plenty of practice covering their trail
My guess is no matter what she says if its not under oath it won’t matter. Even if under oath if you have people that have been compromised well than you see what happens.
Upon seeing the headline, I thought this was going to be a more recent video that could be direct correlate to her SoS tenure.
If this video is from 2000, and Hillary was not SoS til 2007, there’s really nothing actionable here. It shows that she’s contemptible and deceptive, but it’s not a smoking gun to rebut her sworn testimony, no.
No, not actionable, but would love to see Trump and news media talk about it. Despite her lies, her motivation will become more obvious.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.