[arthurus]

He doesn’t “smear” Trump but he obviously doesn’t like him. He should not talk about Trump, just hold his peace until after the election, and continue to talk about the subjects in which he is knowledgeable and wise. He is a true authority on the Constitution and the Declaration, for instance.

[Catsrus]

If he is such an authority on the Constitution, then he would or should have known that Ted Cruz isn’t eligible now or ever to be president. Levin is living in the 80’s. Reagan was a good president, but, like the others, had his flaws. I guess it’s easy to canonize someone you admire and overlook their faults. And, Reagan did some things that weren’t so great.

[Lurkinanloomin]

Can’t be an authority on the Constitution when he doesn’t know what natural born citizen means.

[poconopundit]

Levin may be a Constitution scholar, but he practices a selective reading of the Constitution, such as his blind eye to the requirement for a President to be a natural born citizen.

Much as I hate Obamacare, I thought the Supreme Court calling Obamacare a tax was the reasonable interpretation by Roberts and the other justices. Yet Levin was unhinged over the Roberts decision and spent hours telling us how the Roberts decision violated the Constitution. So Levin cried like a baby over this.

Levin is a lot like his sidekick Ted Cruz. Both are masters at throwing out a lot of intelligent-sounding statements to make you believe they have command over a certain subject.

But this is merely a smoke screen. At their core, Levin and Cruz are nothing more than intelligent liars.

And if you'll recall, Cruz met his match in CBS's Dickerson who beautifully exposed the Cruz technique and left Cruz speechless.

[HangUpNow]

He [Mark 'Brutus' Levin] doesn’t “smear” Trump but he obviously doesn’t like him. He should not talk about Trump, just hold his peace until after the election, and continue to talk about the subjects in which he is knowledgeable and wise.

So if were 1932, Levin should have remained silent, held his peace, and refrained from "smearing" some guy named Adolf Hitler?

Yeah, I guess 1933 would have been the perfect time to have spoken Levin's mind about the dangers of the Nazi Party.

Silence, holding his juvenile grudge, and non-support of Trump during the liberal-GOPe MSM onslaught is TACIT APPROVAL for the election of Frau-Fuhrer Hitlery Clinton. Damn Levin. He's "knowledgeable" in a not-so-nuanced treasonous support of a candidate that will obliterate the Republic. I have ZERO respect for such an unprincipled "constitutional" hypocrite.

[glennaro]

Formerly a regular listener, I’ve listened to a few shows over the past couple of weeks and Levin, while he really doesn’t care for Trump as a candidate, has been quite hard on those who say they won’t vote for Trump in the election. Levin has said recently that to not vote against the Left is not a “conservative” thing to do.