“To be fair..she was doing her job.”
Wrong. Wrong. Wrong.
Hillary was guilty of obstruction of justice and evidence tampering for starters. That’s not “zealously defending” her client. That’s a crime.
You can hear an entire interview she and her attorney had with Sean Hannity here:
http://www.hannity.com/articles/election-493995/listen-rape-victim-speaks-out-about-15196170/
A middle-aged man and teenage boy not only took turns raping this pre-teenage girl, they also beat her nearly to death. She was in a coma for five days.
Her panties had her blood and the man’s semen on it. Hillary demanded to send the panties to another lab. But she and Hillary’s expert cut out the part of the panties with semen on it, sent the part with no semen to the independent lab she chose, and then “lost” the part with the semen.
Hillary not only laughed about the polygraph. She ALSO laughed about the “missing” evidence. THAT’S what got her child rapist client off with two months in jail.
Don’t defend Hillary. Let people know what really happened.
Hillary should have been in prison long, long ago.
If it was hillary’s lab that lost the evidence...then yeah....it is suspicious....and a snake move.
Just to be crystal clear...your version of the story didnt make sense from a procedural point of view. That is why I did some more digging. If you only read Hannity link I can see why you came to the wrong conclusion. Read the story linked in the Hannity article. The prosecutor lost the evidence. Not clinton and “her lab”