Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Judge Napolitano Sides With Hillary Clinton Against the Rape Victims
Fox News (The Kelly Files) | 10/11/2016 | PilgrimsProgress

Posted on 10/11/2016 6:50:13 PM PDT by Pilgrim's Progress

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-87 next last
To: Pilgrim's Progress

There are probably more people watching g Trump on cspan right now than are watching megan kelly. I’very been done with them pretty much since the primaries ended. Boycott all media. We have the internet and live streaming. Boycott their soonsors. We have to do it.


21 posted on 10/11/2016 6:57:54 PM PDT by jersey117
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pilgrim's Progress
Who cares what Judge Neopolitan thinks?

Judge Jeanine Pirro is the one that matters.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9a_ZjUgij9o

22 posted on 10/11/2016 6:58:34 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (If you are not prepared to use force to defend civilization, then be prepared to accept barbarism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bobo1; All

Murdoch is on the board of an open borders group. He’s part of the cheap labor express.

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/01/26/anti-trump-network-fox-news-money-flows-open-borders-group/

Lou Dobbs is pretty good on Fox Business


23 posted on 10/11/2016 6:58:45 PM PDT by TigerClaws
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Lurkinanloomin
Stop watching Faux News. Your blood pressure will improve overnight.

Right you are. I cut cable more than a year ago. And I bought a high quality over-the-air TV antenna. No more cable bills, no more Shepard Smith, no more Megyn Kelly.

But I do get local sports and "Leave it to Beaver" reruns. Life is much better now.

24 posted on 10/11/2016 7:00:01 PM PDT by Leaning Right (Why am I holding this lantern? I am looking for the next Reagan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: reasonisfaith

His never ending commentary on the legal aspects of the Hillary email scandal serve to placate regular citizens who then think “Well, at least our side has people looking at this stuff.”

Andrew Napolitano, progressivist mole.


25 posted on 10/11/2016 7:00:02 PM PDT by reasonisfaith ("...because they received not the love of the truth, that they might be saved." (2 Thessalonians))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Pilgrim's Progress
Napolitano is basically saying that they have nothing.

Legally, I don't think they do.

It would be difficult to prosecute any of the cases on the evidence we've seen so far.

Even in the Paula Jones case, Clinton settled without admitting fault.

But, this isn't a court of law. If the Democrats can try and sentence someone in the media, then they can't defend Bill Clinton against the same tactic.

Once you start digging, sexual assault accusations have been following Bill around as far back as when he was in college at Oxford.

At some point, you have to realize it isn't a coincidence.

26 posted on 10/11/2016 7:00:18 PM PDT by justlurking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pilgrim's Progress
Getting a conviction or a liability determination and whether it happened or not are two different things. The women were being harassed by the agents of the Clintons which caused them to withdraw allegations. . . and later when they felt they possibly could have support from others with similar experience, re-instate them. However, their earlier withdrawals had already damaged their allegations when they re-instated them. The pressures brought to bear on any witnesses they may have by the Clinton agents had further weakened their cases.

The judge hearing one case who ruled that Clinton dropping his pants, exposing himself, and asking one of the accusers to kiss it, did not rise to the level of sexual harassment, showed that the bar was extremely high for any of them to get any justice in the system that was protecting Clinton. . . even when Clinton finally settled that case after the fact for over $800 thousand, most of which went to lawyers! That money came from what I think was an illegal donation fund to defend President Clinton from these accusations. . . but the Liberal courts looked the other way on that too, and allowed tax deductions on the donations!

27 posted on 10/11/2016 7:00:19 PM PDT by Swordmaker (This tag line is a Microsoft insult free zone... but if the insults to Mac users continue...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pilgrim's Progress
Pilgrim's Progress said: "Napolitano is basically saying that they have nothing."

Perhaps Napolitano meant to say that the women have nothing NEW. Or nothing ACTIONABLE.

Paula Jones earned an $850,000 settlement as I recall. That is not nothing. The others waited too long to press the issue. Even you would agree, I think, that there must be some time limit to being able to claim victimhood. After all, time works against a defendant in being able to mount a reasonable defense.

It's too bad Monica Lewinsky didn't realize early on that she had been a naive, immature girl victimized by the most powerful man on the planet. Some people you just can't help.

28 posted on 10/11/2016 7:00:25 PM PDT by William Tell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TakebackGOP
“He believes the 14th Amendment grants birthright citizenship “

Yeah, he really outed himself on that one. That and saying ‘Obama is a natural born Citizen’.

Also remember Bill O’arsehole looking in the camera saying he held Obama’s birth certificate in his hands.

They're nothing but FARKING LIARS AT FAUX NEWS. Running cover for the O'muslim regime.

29 posted on 10/11/2016 7:01:29 PM PDT by Electric Graffiti (Obama voters killed America. Treat them accordingly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Pilgrim's Progress

ABJECT FOOL!!


30 posted on 10/11/2016 7:03:33 PM PDT by wubjo (For a free people mean to remain so, a well-organized and armed militia is their best security.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pilgrim's Progress

Faux News went from a powerhouse and fairly neutral news organization to a joke. It started with Me-Again being promoted. Soon they will be nothing more than another MSNBC.


31 posted on 10/11/2016 7:04:12 PM PDT by stratboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

I do admit that I like Hannity . . . much better since he dropped frogface Colmes off his show.

He brings in interesting guests like Guiliani and Gingrich (who is on right now) . . .


32 posted on 10/11/2016 7:04:57 PM PDT by Pilgrim's Progress (http://www.baptistbiblebelievers.com/BYTOPICS/tabid/335/Default.aspx D)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Pilgrim's Progress
And he had praise for lawyer Clinton as one that had done a great job with the case given her.

So what if she did a great job by lawyer standards. That doesn't change the utter hypocrisy of Clinton claiming her early career was all about helping children, at the Children's Defense Network no less, when in reality she was working overtime to protect a child rapist, using techniques that are now illegal in many states.

The kinds of techniques Clinton used against Kathy Shelton are no longer permitted by courts. That says a lot about Hillary's claims that she was all about helping children.

33 posted on 10/11/2016 7:05:19 PM PDT by freeandfreezing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Pilgrim's Progress

They must have something on him.


34 posted on 10/11/2016 7:05:28 PM PDT by FrdmLvr (A is A)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pilgrim's Progress

They must have something on him.


35 posted on 10/11/2016 7:05:34 PM PDT by FrdmLvr (A is A)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pilgrim's Progress

They must have something on him.


36 posted on 10/11/2016 7:05:34 PM PDT by FrdmLvr (A is A)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wally_bert

Damn, this reminds me of the time I went to a Roger Waters playing Floyd’s Dark Side of the Moon concert in Shang Hai.

He floated a giant pig above the crowd with George Bush written around the ass of the pig.

I stood up and flipped off Roger Waters both barrels and then flipped off the Chinese crowd cheering the pig and left.

We were with friends, which seemed to have no influence on my reaction.


37 posted on 10/11/2016 7:06:08 PM PDT by Eddie01 (Democrats are the Liquidate America Party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Pilgrim's Progress

First mistake you made is watching that waste of oxygen Meeegin Kelly.


38 posted on 10/11/2016 7:06:20 PM PDT by moehoward
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fred Hayek

Even my daughter, who is not the most politically savvy person told me today that “even Fox is so biased!” I was a little surprised she discerned it.


39 posted on 10/11/2016 7:08:47 PM PDT by FrdmLvr (A is A)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

Fox news has NEVER been “Right wing”.

They were the final hold-out of all of the media who moved to the left. So comparatively, they were “right wing”. Everyone else was left.

On their best day they were “Fair and balanced”. But that’s what’s great about Conservativism. Just report the truth and the people will see that it’s the correct path of our nation.

The Left MUST alter things and affect viewpoint in order to expand. The Right is the truth in it’s whole and needs not the hands of producers and editors to make it come together.

So Fox was never right-wing. Not even close.

Face it, everything that you see and hear comes from DisneyViacomSony so everything on the radio and on TV is what they allow you to hear. Including Rush Limbaugh.

If you want to know what conservatives are, want and do the only way is to be face to face or shoulder to shoulder.


40 posted on 10/11/2016 7:08:51 PM PDT by Celerity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-87 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson