Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Windflier
You can get your mouth off of my mom, son.

I was attempting to be polite, stating facts and certainly wasn't disparaging your Mom.

If these dogs were unable to be trained so that they did not present an uncontrollable threat then they should have been put down.

Whose fault would it have been if these dogs had attacked someone?
The dogs or the owner?

'Pit bulls' were not bred to attack humans. Any that did were put down. Also an historical fact that you can look up.

99 posted on 10/02/2016 4:00:52 AM PDT by kanawa (The 1st job of a 'community organizer' is to disorganize the community)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies ]


To: kanawa

You’re obviously a pit bull apologist, and yeah, you did disparage my mom. I was the one who showed politeness, by not ripping your face off for it.

The controversy over pit bulls has nothing to do with their owners, and whether or not they’re training them correctly. If that were the case, you’d see the same percentage of bites and maulings by other breeds, but you don’t.

Statistically, these animals bite and attack more than any other breed of dog. That is simply a fact which outweighs anyone’s opinion on the matter, including yours.

From DogsBite.org:

“In the 11-year period of 2005 through 2015, canines killed 360 Americans. Pit bulls contributed to 64% (232) of these deaths.”

http://www.dogsbite.org/dog-bite-statistics-fatalities-2015.php


109 posted on 10/02/2016 10:18:42 AM PDT by Windflier (Pitchforks and torches ripen on the vine. Left too long, they become black rifles.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson