Posted on 09/28/2016 7:28:54 AM PDT by C19fan
Ater Monday night's presidential debate, most pundits are focusing on who won, who lost, and what it all means for the future of the country. But the only thought that keeps asserting itself in my mind is this: These candidates are terrible at speaking English.
I mean that in the most literal sense possible: They're bad at formulating complete, grammatically correct sentences that effectively carry meaning. And this isn't just a petty complaint about "style" or "form" it says something bigger about America, and this dumpster fire of an election we're in.
(Excerpt) Read more at theweek.com ...
The people we elect ‘look’ like us. Thats always been the way of it.
Because they don’t want to be understood and be held to any specifics.
I could wish this was the worst problem our politicians had. This situation is not so bad that one cannot perceive what they mean.
The general public can’t speak English either. There is no incentive for would-be leaders to speak it correctly.
In fact, what is “correctly”? Is there a standard any more?
Properly used, English is a very precise language.
The last thing a politician wants is to be pinned down to an exact meaning.
This wasn’t really a debate. Hillary and Donald were tweeting at one another :-)
What you said. Yeah.
Bingo.
“dumpster fire of an election”
HA! Good one.
I have much more sympathy for someone who speaks fractured syntax but conveys meaning, unlike every professional politician on the face of the planet.
In fact, what is correctly? Is there a standard any more?
Should, you know, like, do it good or just shut up. What I say!
Bingo! Toss a couple of focus group tested words and phrases out there and let the audience think it all means something when it doesn’t at all.
Politicians are professional liars. that is their only skill.
We can tell how amazing uk politicians are by the nation they created....
“In fact, what is correctly? Is there a standard any more?”
Any adopted usage is ‘correctly”. And no, and there never was. English has grown to become the global language precisely because there is no Acadamie Franciase setting rules and words.
English is fast, and adapts to new technologies and cultures with astounding speed. Prigs wishes notwithstanding, there really are no “rules” of English. Think wild west, or internet circa 2001.
lol
> And, of course, Barack Obama is a talented writer with a gift for turning a sentence, even on the spot.
When his teleprompter goes down he trails off into nothing until his minders turn it back on.
And his book was written by Bill Ayers.
The left has been stealing the language for quite some time. It's a tactic.
They don't want precision. They want to limit thought by limiting the language, by redefining the meaning of words.
“This act of stealing is a tactic.”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.