Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Is Naval Conflict With China Inevitable?
real clear politics ^ | Sept. 3 2016 | Seth Cropsey

Posted on 09/05/2016 6:49:22 PM PDT by traumer

This week, President Obama is making his final trip to Asia. With the presidential election looming, it is the right time to reflect on Obama’s foreign policy, and to think about what is to come. A key component of the next president’s foreign policy must be to compel China to respect international law. Otherwise, we may be faced by a conflict with a growing navy at a time when ours is decreasing in size. Obama has not made this imperative any easier.

On July 12 an international tribunal at The Hague found that China possessed neither an historic claim over disputed islands in the South China Sea nor a legal basis for sovereign claims over its waters. On the same day Beijing landed civilian aircraft on two of the three reefs—Subi and Mischief—that China has turned into armed islands. This gives China three working runways in the disputed Spratly Islands the nearest of which is 600 miles from China.

Notwithstanding Chinese President Xi Jinping’s 2015 statement to President Obama that the manmade islands would not be militarized, continued construction of hardened hangars demonstrates Beijing’s intent to deploy combat aircraft to the islands. The CSIS Asia Maritime Transparency website shows what the islands will look like when People’s Liberation Army Air Force fighter aircraft arrive.

(Excerpt) Read more at realclearpolitics.com ...


TOPICS: Chit/Chat; Military/Veterans
KEYWORDS: bhoasia; redchina

1 posted on 09/05/2016 6:49:23 PM PDT by traumer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: traumer

Please, God.. Please let President Trump be in the oval office.


2 posted on 09/05/2016 6:50:31 PM PDT by Celerity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: traumer

By Former Deputy Undersecretary of the US Navy under both President Ronald Reagan and President George H.W. Bush


3 posted on 09/05/2016 6:50:43 PM PDT by traumer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: traumer

We would kick their butts even under Obama.


4 posted on 09/05/2016 6:53:56 PM PDT by DIRTYSECRET (urope. Why do they put up with this.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: traumer

Obama, Algore and Kerri’ have postulated that the islands will be below the waves in 20 years. No worries mate.


5 posted on 09/05/2016 6:58:45 PM PDT by Glad2bnuts (If Republicans are not prepared to carry on the Revolution of 1776, prepare for a communist takeover)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DIRTYSECRET

We would need to do it quick or 0bama would pull us out.


6 posted on 09/05/2016 7:00:39 PM PDT by BBell (calm down and eat your sandwiches)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Glad2bnuts

One typhoon away from starting all over.


7 posted on 09/05/2016 7:00:57 PM PDT by USNBandit (Sarcasm engaged at all times)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: USNBandit

https://amti.csis.org/build-it-and-they-will-come/


8 posted on 09/05/2016 7:06:03 PM PDT by traumer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: traumer

A nuclear war with China is inevitable unless we get some adults in our government.


9 posted on 09/05/2016 7:07:30 PM PDT by GingisK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DIRTYSECRET
We would kick their butts even under Obama.

With a CIC that would stand down for first strike? With a military that has been gutted of its decent officers, to be replaced with a PC bunch of pansies? With a military that gets to show a stress card to get a little time off from their DIs?

10 posted on 09/05/2016 7:10:05 PM PDT by GingisK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: traumer

The way they treated Obama this past weekend? They do not respect our leader. Do you think they respect our Navy?


11 posted on 09/05/2016 7:19:00 PM PDT by Vermont Lt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: traumer
Is Naval Conflict With China Inevitable?

If so, how could one think it would end there?

12 posted on 09/05/2016 7:24:50 PM PDT by Roccus (When you talk to a politician...ANY politician...always say, "Remember Ceausescu")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: traumer

Under Dorkbama the Muslim Eunuch or Hillary the lying low IQ man-beast, hell yes.


13 posted on 09/05/2016 7:25:20 PM PDT by Da Coyote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: traumer

Pretty much we are telling the Chinese, that the South China sea, should be run from the Netherlands, by European courts, enforced by Americans.
So yeah, there will eventually be a war. 2 years...20 years, who knows.

But basically this is 1900 again, the western powers want to make the rules. And I would bet that a modern boxer rebellion is coming.
But it will likely be economic war, not the crude bomb and shell variant.


14 posted on 09/05/2016 7:30:09 PM PDT by DesertRhino (Dogs are man's best friend, and moslems hate dogs. Add that up....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: traumer

Not until they’ve dominated and subjugated all of Asia. Their build up, militarily, is not to fight the US but to ensure military dominance over the Asian countries.

Japan, Taiwan, South Korea, India.

That’s who the Chinese are aiming to beat, militarily. They’ll hold off for the US until they have Asia in the bag. And at that point, it probably won’t matter about a conflict with the US, since over half the world’s population (and, realistically, the only regions left that still have extreme growth potential) will be under their control.


15 posted on 09/05/2016 7:39:35 PM PDT by Shanghai Dan (I ride a GS scooter with my hair cut neat...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Shanghai Dan

Wasn’t the snub of Obama at the G-20 at least partially a response to the war pact made last week between the U.S. and India ?

That war pact also included Austrailia and Japan.

With South Korea, the Phillipines and Viet Nam also countering China it seems like some serious posturing going on that is not just about the US and China.


16 posted on 09/05/2016 10:48:31 PM PDT by jcon40
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: traumer

All it takes is one SSGN (USS Ohio, Florida, Georgia, Michigan) to unload its compliment of 154 Tomahawk cruise missiles into the Three Gorges Dam and China becomes a memory.


17 posted on 09/06/2016 3:58:34 AM PDT by Tonytitan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson