The Speech That Killed Him? (JFK)

Youtube ^ | today

[PLMerite]

Inna Godda Da Oswald.

[thesligoduffyflynns]

please dont accuse me of something i am not guilty of

[thesligoduffyflynns]

i have a tendency to agree with you not knowing much about kennedy i think you’re right

[thesligoduffyflynns]

wow never knew this-— that was interesting

[safeasthebanks]

Please don’t be disingenuous on the internet. We have enough of that already.

And don’t bother responding. I’m not interested and won’t be reading it.

[politicianslie]

I could talk about JFK theories until the cows come home

WHY talk about wild assessed guesses (which Americans have been taught are "Conspiracy Theories") when you can talk about how to PROVE what actually happened?

You have basically TWO piles of evidence:

1. A massive pile of evidence that says clearly that LH Oswald fired THREE shots from behind that killed President Kennedy and wounded TWO other men. There was no conspiracy, Oswald acted ALONE!

2. A much smaller pile of information that is frequently comprised of what amounts to hearsay, rumors, unofficial interviews...... and just plain BS.

So which is right, (1) or (2)?

Some will say (1) is right, the credible evidence the US government presents is overwhelming in it's depth and in it's consistency. They conclude the US government's case is rock solid.

But others say that some of the details with the government's scenario is flawed and inconsistent with itself. Numerous witnesses give stories that are totally inconsistent with (1).

Picking just one of the MANY, MANY conflicting details:

On the left of the figure is the US government's version of the back of JFK's head. On the right side is a Parkland Doctor's sketch of what he said he saw.

Common sense tells us that it would be possible (but NOT likely) that the US government could have forged information to hide the fact that there was clear evidence of a shot from the front of JFK.

On the other hand, it would be impossible for dozens of eye witnesses to have formed a conspiracy to say they saw a massive exit wound in the right rear of JFK's head if it wasn't really there. But what witnesses say they saw or heard by itself IS NOT SUFFICIENT TO PROVE THE US GOVERNMENT LIED and FORGED EVIDENCE.

Fortunately, there is evidence which by itself is sufficient to PROVE the US government forged, lied and harassed witnesses to hide the truth.

This is a summary of how to START to prove to yourself we have been lied to.

I don't expect many of you will be knowledgeable enough to understand the trivial statistics that make the following true. The purpose here is to introduce to you that Americans can know the truth, but only if they want to do a bit of work understanding how the US government pulled off the biggest scam in history. If it was easy, Vince Bugliosi would have figured this out.

How to prove what happened during the shooting

[Pelham]

“On the other hand, it would be impossible for dozens of eye witnesses to have formed a conspiracy to say they saw a massive exit wound in the right rear of JFK’s head if it wasn’t really there. “

Interesting that these dozens of eye witnesses had the expertise to know it was an exit wound. Where did they get their training?

[yefragetuwrabrumuy]

There is one little element there you might be neglecting.

Top notch, government run assassins rarely kill anyone themselves. They have long had a better way.

Find a “capable kook”, typically someone who is reasonably proficient with a weapon, but who is clinically mentally ill. Paranoids are the best because they often have good situational awareness and focus,as well as heightened senses. Then the assassin uses several means to *persuade* the capable kook that the target is the cause of all his, the paranoid’s, problems.

The assassin must tactfully create a trifecta. First they must persuade the kook to act. Then they must cajole them to act in a time and place and with means that will give them the optimal chance of success, the hard part convincing them that *they* thought this up.

And lastly, that they utterly reject the idea of giving credit for any of it to the assassin. He must become utterly important to the capable kook’s world view, as if he was a long forgotten classmate in elementary school.

When the hit goes down, the assassin should be a “Two countries away, sipping highballs in a Holiday Inn”.

Oswald may, or may not, have been such a capable kook, but he sure as heck fits that profile.

[fatman6502002]

You’re right about that.

[Falconspeed]

Excellent analysis. Thank you.

[politicianslie]

When the hit goes down, the assassin should be a “Two countries away, sipping highballs in a Holiday Inn”.

Oswald may, or may not, have been such a capable kook, but he sure as heck fits that profile.

I agree with you (and the US government) that Oswald totally fit the bill to kill JFK. Defector to Russia, documented unstable behavior......

But I don't agree with you that it is possible that Oswald KILLED JFK.

HERE IS WHY it is IMPOSSIBLE that LHO killed JFK:

Get out your calculator and verify this simple calculation.

President Kennedy was shot at Zapruder frame 313

Immediately after the sign in the Z film, Gov. Connally BEGINS his FIRST reaction to a shot and it is entirely consistent with what Connally said in interview, after interview, after interview. Connally never wavered about this detail. That frame where he FIRST reacts to the shot is Z224.

The FBI measured the Zapruder film speed by filming a clock and determining the number of frames per second (simple counting showed 18.3 frames per second).

Therefore the time between Z224 and Z313 is

TIME (Z224 to Z313) = (313 - 224)/18.3 = 4.8 seconds

So you say OK, why is 4.8 seconds significant?

Here is WHY:

You should notice that the time between shots #3 and #4 in the acoustical analysis matches the time between Z224 and Z313 in the Zapruder film. If the times between shots in the Z film matches the times between shots in the acoustical analysis, then that means BOTH are valid measures of the time between shots. Knowing that the sounds of the shot were recorded means a conspiracy killed President Kennedy. This information soon leads to the determination it wasn't just a conspiracy, it was a powerful conspiracy conducted from high in the US government.

If you argue that 4.8 seconds is NOT significant, then you are saying that the acoustical experts who analyzed the shot patterns on the Dallas police radio tape just happened to guess that 4.8 seconds was between two of the shots exactly like the Zapruder film shows.

Many near brain dead JFKers at this point bring out the "fact" that the acoustical analysis has been PROVEN to NOT contain the sounds of gunfire. Nothing could be further from the truth. There is NOBODY ELSE who has ever determined that the acoustical analysis shots lines up with the Zaprduer film like I show you. NOBODY. Therefor nobody has ever evaluated both the acoustical methodology called echo correlation analysis AND the fact the times between shots matches what the Z film shows. This information taken together easily proves the sounds of the shots were recorded.

That should be almost impossible to believe because this is the most written about one day event in history and yet everybody else missed 4.8 seconds followed by BANG-BANG. The gubermint said the last two sounds were caused by echoes but the acoustical analysis proves the last sounds were BANG-BANG.

There is a great deal more analysis that must be done before it all comes together. If this was easy, Vince Bugliosi might have guessed the correct answer but he didn't have the tools needed to be able to understand the evidence. Instead, Bugliosi simply took information at face value and got the answer he "felt" was right.

What I've shown here is just a start to proving the JFK assassination "mystery" is a scam. It never was a mystery, it has always been a lie. To fool Americans, you only have to fool the presstitutes. These technically illiterate fools will work 24/7 to show Americans their masters, the gubermint, are telling the truth when the lies are big enough to drive semi trucks through them.

There are DOZENS of wtnesses who say the last two shots were BANG-BANG just like the audio recording analysis shows. These witnesses were ignored and discredited by the conspirators running the investigation scam.

Patricia Ann Donaldson is one of DOZENS of witnesses who heard BANG-BANG just like the audio analysis indicates

[politicianslie]

In post 51 I explained a bit more on how to PROVE the US government forged evidence and harassed witnesses to hide the truth in the JFK assassination.

As Americans are starting to realize, the US government has a large component of scam artists who profit from lying and deceiving the public. The assassination of President Kennedy was in some ways the beginning of the end of a legitimate government. It’s important to understand that history so today’ headlines can be seen through and understood too.

Those who don’t understand the lessons of history are going to see them repeated until the public finally puts a stop to it.

[yefragetuwrabrumuy]

Who and how are argued endlessly, and I really have no dog in that fight compared to *why*.

[politicianslie]

Who and how are argued endlessly, and I really have no dog in that fight compared to *why*.

Here is HOW you can know the truth about the JFK assassination:

1. Understand how to PROVE what happened during the shooting

2. When you compare what happened during the shooting (proved in #1) to what the US government said happened, it becomes very obvious very quickly that the fix was in.

3. When you see how the US government forged and lied to hide the truth, you have to ask WHO had the power to turn lies into truth? Who had the power to confiscate all of the Dallas evidence and forge and lie to hide the truth?

4. There's only ONE answer to (3). That is J. Edgar (Cross dressing pervert) Hoover.

5. Who had the power to fix the investigation to cover for Hoover?

At this point, simply CONSIDER it was a conspiracy led by President Lyndon Johnson and FBI Dir J Edgar Hoover. What could they have done?

First of all, the two scumbags controlled all the evidence and they handpicked all of the Warren Commission members. A couple of the members were white rats. One (Ford) rode his sell out all the way to POTUS.

So what is DIFFERENT about what I have showed you than you knew before? The answer is simply that the TIMES BETWEEN SHOTS IN THE ZAPRUDER FILM IS THE SAME AS THE TIMES BETWEEN SHOTS IN THE ACOUSTICAL ANALYSIS.

If you argue that is not true then it shows you can't use a calculator. If you argue that if this is true, then someone else would tell you whether it is important. This is the most written about one day event in history and no one else tells you the time between two of the shots in both the Z film and the acoustical analysis is 4.8 seconds? How could that be possible?

If you continue to follow, you will soon understand it is EASY to fool Americans, you only have to fool the presstitutes. My father was a lifetime journalist and he explained journalist start as pre-Med, the end up in Pre-law, then architecture school..... At the end of the line, is journalism school. They are some of the most technologically illiterate "educated" people there are and they control what Americans think. Saying it another way, fool the presstitutes and control what Americans think.

The way the JFK scam has evolved is hide much of the evidence and forge what needed to be faked. Convince the presstitutes that the Single Bullet Theory (SBT) is possible even when it is obviously not possible. Americans have been made to look like the biggest pack of fools in history. Do you now understand how Hillary and Bill got to the point of rich and powerful?