Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Heroin cut with elephant tranquilizer may have caused 60 overdoses across two states in just...
Washington post ^ | August 25, 2016 | Katie Mettler

Posted on 08/26/2016 8:44:16 AM PDT by Morgana

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-51 last
To: Junk Silver

Yeah, really! Everyone knows that heroin alone is perfectly safe. /sarc/


41 posted on 08/26/2016 10:14:45 AM PDT by ManHunter (You can run, but you'll only die tired... Army snipers: Reach out and touch someone)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

Another bucket of water out of the shallow end of the gene pool...


42 posted on 08/26/2016 10:15:25 AM PDT by ManHunter (You can run, but you'll only die tired... Army snipers: Reach out and touch someone)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Timpanagos1

Maybe they have them in those dispensers in the bathrooms at gas stations.


43 posted on 08/26/2016 10:19:45 AM PDT by Trillian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: newbolt

“...use carfentanil as an execution drug ...”

Oh, I dunno... I’d think having your head stuck up an elephant’s butt (as seen in the video) for a few moments - and the THREAT of it - would be enough of a deterrent for even the most hardened criminal...

As a matter of fact, after ONE episode I’d imagine they’d become Model Citizens...

And you know the WORST part of it...? That poor guy will FOREVER be known as the dude who’s head corked a pachyderm’s posterior.

Like I said... you’ll never have a day THAT bad...


44 posted on 08/26/2016 10:19:57 AM PDT by NFHale (The Second Amendment - By Any Means Necessary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Spunky

Ping for later


45 posted on 08/26/2016 10:52:06 AM PDT by Spunky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: COBOL2Java
Well, it did in the first year:

An obvious question: From whence do you get accurate numbers regarding consumption in an illegal industry?

I've noticed that once an issue has agenda advocates, they tend to cherry pick available data (and even make it up) to support the conclusion they want.

People who don't have an agenda generally don't look at reported data with a critical eye, but merely accept what they are told because they assume whoever is telling them also does not have an agenda.

That is often not the case. We see it again and again with the "Gay" issue, with Abortion, and with Global Warming, and yes, with Drugs and Prohibition.

46 posted on 08/26/2016 10:54:40 AM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: DiogenesLamp

If prohibition was so successful, then why was it revoked less than 10 years later?


47 posted on 08/26/2016 10:58:59 AM PDT by COBOL2Java (Trump is to the political class what Uber is to taxicab companies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Morgana
Elephant tranquilizer?

That means Michael Moore and Rosie O'Donuts aren't even safe...

48 posted on 08/26/2016 11:03:16 AM PDT by BlueMondaySkipper (Involuntarily subsidizing the parasite class since 1981)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: COBOL2Java
If prohibition was so successful, then why was it revoked less than 10 years later?

Because the power structure of the nation absolutely hated it. Washington D.C. was against it in the first place, and congress spent most of prohibition drunk on illegal booze. Same with the financial titans of New York. (and all the other major cities) The real power blocks of the Nation simply saw it as a "tantrum" that had been thrown by all the ignorant "hoi poloi" in what we now refer to as "flyover country."

Prohibition was undermined right from the start by people who disagreed with it, and worked hard to both violate and profit from it.

Prohibition was a bad idea. Too draconian in implementation, and too wrong headed. Alcohol had been part of mankind's existence for 10 million years, or so articles i've read have told me.

It was foolish to believe you could eradicate it in a few years by voting it away. If their goal was to get rid of alcohol, the methodology they are currently using to eradicate tobacco usage would have worked much better.

A slow gradual squeeze might have produced eventual success when that fast, draconian prohibition simply created a resentful backlash and quick paths to profit.

Not that we should have done it, but the concept of "prohibition" might have worked had it been implemented in the slow squeeze "Python" sort of methodology, such as slowly taxing it into oblivion.

49 posted on 08/26/2016 11:11:47 AM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Douglas

I really hate when my elephant tranquilizer has heroin in it!


50 posted on 08/26/2016 11:30:32 AM PDT by TexasRepublic (Socialism is the gospel of envy and the religion of thieves. Socialism is governmental theft!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

In related news, the collective IQ of the tri-state area has had a recent upward trend.


51 posted on 08/27/2016 11:03:38 AM PDT by Excuse_My_Bellicosity (Liberalism is a social disease.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-51 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson