1 posted on
08/25/2016 8:57:03 AM PDT by
BenLurkin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-27 next last
To: BenLurkin
It’s not the speed - it’s the sudden stop that gets you.
2 posted on
08/25/2016 8:58:20 AM PDT by
Fido969
(Maybe I';ve been posting for the last 10 years, and rather than spew cr@p you could look up my posts)
To: BenLurkin
a sufficiently large dust particle will create a collision energetic enough to destroy a craft. And sufficiently large isnt very big; the authors estimate that it only has to be 15 micrometers across to kill off the craft. Fortunately, dust particles this size are rare, and the authors calculate the odds of running into one at 1050 to one against."Goldberg would love to do it!"
3 posted on
08/25/2016 8:58:43 AM PDT by
BenLurkin
(The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
To: BenLurkin
Dunno. I think you come out younger.
4 posted on
08/25/2016 9:00:36 AM PDT by
Jim W N
To: BenLurkin
6 posted on
08/25/2016 9:01:45 AM PDT by
dfwgator
To: BenLurkin
They tumble blindly as they make their way across the universe.
7 posted on
08/25/2016 9:02:51 AM PDT by
MUDDOG
To: BenLurkin
If you’re a photon...not dangerous at all.
8 posted on
08/25/2016 9:03:48 AM PDT by
Bloody Sam Roberts
(Don't question faith. Don't answer lies.)
To: BenLurkin
10 posted on
08/25/2016 9:05:25 AM PDT by
relictele
(Principiis obsta & Finem respice - Resist The Beginnings & Consider The Ends.)
To: BenLurkin
Why don’t they ask capt kirk how they did it?
11 posted on
08/25/2016 9:07:06 AM PDT by
lurk
(T)
To: BenLurkin
If there is a single object in the universe traveling at 20% of the speed of light, then we are already traveling at 20% of the speed of light
12 posted on
08/25/2016 9:08:30 AM PDT by
dsrtsage
(One half of all people have below average IQ. In the US the number is 54%en)
To: BenLurkin
Given we are no where near achieving that velocity, its not dangerous at all.
14 posted on
08/25/2016 9:10:36 AM PDT by
Phlap
(REDNECK@LIBARTS.EDU)
To: BenLurkin
Thanks for posting, it's in our genes to continue to push the speed record, and explore. I think both go hand in hand.
Micro particles could possibly be dealt with using some arrangement of electrostatic fields, the larger grains with lasers, and the even larger objects by avoidance.
In pursuit of speed and journey, we often find solutions to problems along the way.
And while we may not be able to exceed the speed of light, I personally have found no reason we can't out run it.
To: BenLurkin
A grain of sand carries a lot of (kinetic) energy at .2C hitting one would be like setting off an A bomb. This space ship better hope it does not encounter anything more massive then a heavy molecule on its' trip to the stars.
17 posted on
08/25/2016 9:15:59 AM PDT by
jpsb
(Never believe anything in politics until it has been officially denied. Otto von Bismark)
To: BenLurkin
Thanks for posting. 1000 to 1 odds does not sound that good. They will need something to detect, deflect and/or or destroy the matter. Perhaps one or more unmanned shield vehicles in front of the craft that absorb the crap and provide a wake the manned craft can ride behind. As one blows up you still have more shields remaining.
To: BenLurkin
When I’m transported to Heaven at light speed+, I’ll let you know how it felt. :)
24 posted on
08/25/2016 9:27:16 AM PDT by
Jim W N
To: BenLurkin
One in a thousand is better than the sailing ships of old when we started to explore the oceans.
26 posted on
08/25/2016 9:34:43 AM PDT by
BitWielder1
(I'd rather have Unequal Wealth than Equal Poverty.)
To: BenLurkin
Just leave your physical body behind and it is not hard at all.
To: BenLurkin
Ahh, now we know. Those are NOT stars in the sky, it’s only various size dust spots hitting our atmosphere.
29 posted on
08/25/2016 10:07:26 AM PDT by
MeneMeneTekelUpharsin
(Freedom is the freedom to discipline yourself so others don't have to do it for you.)
To: BenLurkin
It depends. If you have a beer in one hand and a cell phone in the other, it might be more dangerous.
To: BenLurkin
We already have the propulsion technology to go 10% of the speed of light by using nukes to propel the vehicle.
33 posted on
08/25/2016 10:25:37 AM PDT by
C19fan
To: BenLurkin
37 posted on
08/25/2016 11:24:15 AM PDT by
showme_the_Glory
((ILLEGAL: prohibited by law. ALIEN: Owing political allegiance to another country or government))
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-27 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson