Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Licensed-To-Carry
I think.

But I don't! };^)

Seriously, I'm talking distance and time, not speed.

Object "A" travels left from point "C" at the speed of light for one second. Object "B" travels right from "C" at the speed of light for one second. At the end of that second, light from "A" to "B" would take two seconds, light from either "A" or "B" to "C" would only take one second. Not sure I'm getting across here, but it doesn't matter much anyway since the Vogon construction fleet is building the bypass this afternoon.

43 posted on 08/17/2016 6:43:12 AM PDT by Roccus (When you talk to a politician, any politician, just say, "Remember Ceaucescu"))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]


To: Roccus

All this confusing talk about the speed of light . . but what about the speed of dark?


45 posted on 08/17/2016 6:52:02 AM PDT by 2nd Amendment (Proud member of the 48% . . giver not a taker)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]

To: Roccus

Your imaginary demonstration starts to reveal the problem, IMHO. Allow me to elaborate. Let us say that for any point we have whatever number of original observers and they all set off in different directions in pairs. At some given time interval one member of each pair stops and the other continues moving. Shortly thereafter all members observe the speed of light coming from the original point. According to Einstein everybody will get the same result. “There is no preferred frame of reference.”


51 posted on 08/17/2016 6:57:50 AM PDT by wastoute (Government cannot redistribute wealth. Government can only redistribute poverty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson