Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: C19fan

Bismarck had better fire control than the Yamato.
Yamato had bigger guns, heavier armor, and longer ranges.
It would be closer to a ‘fair’ fight than either side would like.
Both of ‘em would have been in deep trouble if they ran into an Iowa.


16 posted on 08/15/2016 8:19:11 AM PDT by Little Ray (Freedom Before Security!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Little Ray; Bull Snipe; TalonDJ

Agreed. The Iowa’s were the pinnacle of battleship development, IMO.

Better Naval engineering, maneuvering speed, top speed, seaworthyness (better than Bismark, at least) fire control (except possibly optical, which the Germans were supposedly very good at) and damage control systems and training.

If I had a choice of any ship of those three to be on in a fight, it would be an Iowa class.

That said, the amount and type of ordinance used to sink the IJN Yamato was staggering. When attacking by torpedo bomber, they had to purposely concentrate on one side of the Yamato, because the Mushashi stayed afloat longer than she should have due to her staying upright longer, IIRC.


28 posted on 08/15/2016 9:11:14 AM PDT by rlmorel (Orwell described Liberals when he wrote of those who "repudiate morality while laying claim to it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: Little Ray
Both of ‘em would have been in deep trouble if they ran into an Iowa.

Bismarck yes...Yamato no.

Yamato was too well armored and armed over the Iowas.

42 posted on 08/15/2016 10:36:16 AM PDT by ealgeone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson