She’s a lying sack of sh!t I say, A lying sack of SH!T....
Trump to Clinton: You and your husband have been criminals near your whole life. Explain yourselves.
When do you stop selling state secrets and favors for profit, 200 million? 400 million? 10 billion?
He could hold up a chart showing the thousands of times he spoke to the press and answered questions compared with the two or three times she did. Then just pound her with it.
If the time comes when she must make the case to take the nation to war how will she convince Americans that her reasons for doing so are, in fact, true and that she is not lying?
Actually, the good ones I’ll just forward to campaign officials.
Why let her know in advance?
1) How will you balance the federal budget?
Tax increases or spending cuts?
2) What is your justification for increasing Syrian refugees by 550%? How can an immigrant be vetted without reliable documents?
3) How do you propose to get Q clearance (top secret) after FBI director testified your behavior in handling classified emails was extremely careless?
Hillary, how well did you know Seth Rich?
Not original material, most posted here in some form or another for years.
1. Everything you tax more, you get less of. Everything you regulate more, you get less of. That is a fact. That is the democrat plan for the economy, less economy. 94 million working age Americans can’t find a job, more than ever. There is a reason for that and is not republicans in congress. They have not denied Obama one cent.
2. We know what government run healthcare looks like . It’s called the V.A. And it is a disaster where corruption, waste, and incompetence flourish while accountability is non-existent.
3. Democrats want the illegal alien vote now and forever into the future and they do not care how many Americans are robbed, raped, killed, or left jobless to get it.
4. Democrats want to create jobs through government run infrastructure builds. Didn’t we do this for a trillion dollars back in 2009 when DEMS controlled congress and the WH? Where are all the jobs, new roads, schools and airports? You cannot trust them to blow your money again for NOTHING.
5. To the urban minority communities. Democrats have been running ALL your cities for 50 years. They promised everything and delivered absolutely NOTHING! But every 4 years they show up on your street and church to blame someone else. When are you going to accept that you have been USED, over and over. Look around your neighborhood and schools, has anything changed for the better the last 8 years.
6. The rich pay about 90% of taxes now. They pay their fair share and then some. We don’t have a revenue problem we have a spending problem. You could confiscate every penny Trump has made his entire life and in less than a week you would only have paid for the amount government spends beyond what it took in. Someday we are just going to run out of money. Then what?
7. It took just 16 years of “progressive” policy to take S. America ‘s most prosperous country and completely destroy it’s economy. There is a reason that nobody on the left wants to talk about Venezuela.
He doesn’t take advice from anyone except himself.
Barack Hussein Obama does not believe “ISIL” has anything to do with “Islam.” Do you believe the same as Imam Barack Obama that the Islamic State is not authentic Islam and if so which Imam do you follow for the correct teachings of Islam?
Mrs. Clinton: What time of day do you feel is best for praying to Satan? Morning? Noon? Night?
“She may not tell an outright lie...”
In what drug-addled universe is that true?
Hello, Hillary, my good friend! From the moment Bill talked me into running I’ve been waiting to say this! I now concede the election to you. Happy presidenting! I think I’ll just go on to my nice little life now... :)
Is it true that flashing lights have a debilitating effect on you?
Say Cheeeeze ............
The fact is we had four dead Americans! Was it because of a protest or was it because of guys out for a walk one night who decided they’d go kill some Americans? What difference at this point does it make? - Hillary ClintonIt makes no difference between those two options. The reality is that the Benghazi attack, and the whole story of ISIS from then until now, puts paid to the fable that the “General Motors is alive and Osama bin Laden is dead” meme represents a successful Obama/Clinton foreign policy.The “protest of a video” fable was never anything but a fraudulent cover story to get the Administration past the two months from 9/11/12 to the first Wednesday in November. And in furtherance of this swindle, the maker of the otherwise insignificant video was arbitrarily imprisoned. And the US State Department spent money apologizing for the video. That money should be reimbursed by the DNC.
“Bobbing and weaving” - and lying.
Hillary Clinton is running for president. In 1992 Hillary Clinton promoted the idea that she would be a “co president,” and she was always counted as a force to be reckoned with in the White House in those years. She does not want anyone to mention the 22nd Amendment in that regard, of course . . . A lot has been made of the email scandal which the FBI has announced represents gross negligence on the part of Hillary in the handling of sensitive information. That is part of a pattern, we have seen this before.
The White House FBI files controversy of the Clinton Administration, often referred to as Filegate,[1] arose in June 1996 around improper access in 1993 and 1994 to Federal Bureau of Investigation security-clearance documents. Craig Livingstone, director of the White House's Office of Personnel Security, improperly requested, and received from the FBI, background reports concerning several hundred individuals without asking permission. The revelations provoked a strong political and press reaction because many of the files covered White House employees from previous Republican administrations, including top presidential advisors. - WikipediaThis scandal was so toxic - hundreds of counts of a felony, committed in the White House itself - that it was finally announced that Craig Livingstone “was fired” - note the passive voice - but the White House absolutely refused to admit who hired, or even who fired, Craig Livingstone. The Wikipedia link above claims Livingstone resigned, but that was not the story at the time.Craig Livingstone was never prosecuted for his felonies, and no one was assigned blame for his hiring. In a logical world, that means that “it happened on Bill Clinton’s watch” is the true location of responsibility - but politics is not logical, and he never was held to account for it.
Now the issue is whether privacy matters at all in 21st Century America. If Hillary can be utterly indifferent to secrecy of the US government when it does not suit her convenience to care for it, why are we to believe that she cared any more for the privacy of prominent American citizens - mostly Republican, but also Democrat - which were violated by the White House early in the Clinton Administration? Hillary Clinton knew, and knows, who hired Craig Livingstone. And probably did it herself, with malice aforethought.
He can point out that the "balanced budget" was enabled by several factors that had nothing to do with his policies.
1. The end of the Cold War.
2. The revenue from the tech boom, and later from Y2K.
3. In spite of numerous AQ attacks, effectively punting the WOT and its expense to the next administration.
The jobs that were created during his watch were from the tech boom, which in turn helped boost other industries. The whole mess was built on the tech bubble, which started to burst a year before he left office.
And don't forget the 500,000 Iraqi children and teens who were killed as a result of his policies, but that was a price we were willing to pay, wasn't it?
Part II: “I have proposed reforming trade agreements. As part of that, I will ask Congress to pass a law that any foreign corporation importing goods to the U.S. must meet minimum standards that already pertain to U.S. companies, commensurate with their own economies. This includes a decent salary, better working conditions, and health benefits. A panel of labor union representatives would certify that these corporations meet those minimum standards. I believe this would improve the lot of many foreign workers and move many jobs back back to the U.S.”