[American Quilter]

Outrageous, and so sad for our country.

[relictele]

regulating ad content violates the advertiser’s First Amendment rights

The contract precedes any speech 'rights' therefore allowing them to be posted is an endorsement.

[wastoute]

That right there should put an end to any Federal funding.

[Personal Responsibility]

It’s fine if they do this until it offends muslims. When that happens, the ads will come down to protect their delicate flower sensibilities (and to prevent an outbreak of Random Muslim Explosion Syndrome)

[Carthego delenda est]

Disgusting.

[Hillarys Gate Cult]

Let me guess. The ad slogan is;

“Who wants fudge?”

[I want the USA back]

Because the political establishment is committed to destroying the Judeo-Christian values on which the laws of this country were founded, and to establishing an atheist government.

[heterosupremacist]

http://cnsnews.com/s3/files/styles/content_30p/s3/squirt_ad_0.jpg?itok=kAkQG2kd

[Disambiguator]

Even the domain name is revolting.

[wardaddy]

That’s disgusting and exemplifies the true nature of particularly male homosexuality

[castlegreyskull]

When I was in middle school and learned about Sodom and Gommorah, I never believed that men really behaved the way it was described. I believe it now.

[a fool in paradise]

This isn’t “advocacy”?

[godgunsglory59]

Kids will see this ad. There will be no wholesome alternative because of their policy. SICK

[Jack Hammer]

Oh, puh-leez - they don’t give a rat’s *ss about the First Amendment.

[NetAddicted]

How many faggots live in DC? Why do they live there? They can’t all be politicians.