We ARE at war with islam HERE. Why Dallas Police used the robot with explosives, a theory.

The Dallas Police used an explosive device to kill Micah X. Johnson, one of the shooters at the BLM protest. Later in the news, it was reported that he had weapons and explosives and obviously information in the house to show that he planned something far larger. After the incident in Nice, it becomes obvious that there are muslim operatives who apparently are sleepers or sleeper cells who are wreaking havoc there, and, there are some who have done the same thing here. As more muslims are brought in (by plan), we are going to see far more killing of Americans by muslims here.

Back to the robot and the explosive device. Why didn't the Dallas SWAT just rush Johnson (Khafed Hassen) and try to take him alive using the ballistic shield equipment they have so they could interrogate them? Sources tell me he told them things that showed he DEFINITELY had knowledge of explosives and how to use them. Rushing him with ballistic shield equipment would have been pointless, causing the death of the officers involved and, of course, resulting in Johnson's death anyway.

This man calmly presented himself as regular military while purchasing a weapon in a legal on-the-street sale. It is becoming apparent that he was an operative. There is a LOT more to the story that authorities are not telling people so as to not cause panic. Trump already knows all of this and knows we are at war. One must wonder why leaders don't do what HAS to be done and deport muslims and raze mosques. It is because leaders have been bought off (bribed) in a big way. Now, they're trapped. They either follow through with decisions they are told to make, or they will be exposed by those who've paid them off, resulting in prison terms (or what should be execution for treason).

And the common denominator is............

The Nice Attacker was a Muslim
The Shoe Bomber was a Muslim
The Beltway Snipers were Muslims
The Fort Hood Shooter was a Muslim
The underwear Bomber was a Muslim
The U-S.S. Cole Bombers were Muslims
The Madrid Train Bombers were Muslims
The Bafi Nightclub Bombers were Muslims
The London Subway Bombers were Muslims
The Moscow Theatre Attackers were Muslims
The Boston Marathon Bombers were Muslims
The Pan-Am flight #93 Bombers were Muslims
The Air France Entebbe Hijackers were Muslims
The Iranian Embassy Takeover, was by Muslims
The Beirut U.S. Embassy bombers were Muslims
The Libyan U.S. Embassy Attack was by Musiims
The Buenos Aires Suicide Bombers were Muslims
The Israeli Olympic Team Attackers were Muslims
The Kenyan U.S, Embassy Bombers were Muslims
The Saudi, Khobar Towers Bombers were Muslims
The Beirut Marine Barracks bombers were Muslims
The Besian Russian School Attackers were Muslims
The first World Trade Center Bombers were Muslims
The Bombay & Mumbai India Attackers were Muslims
The Achille Lauro Cruise Ship Hijackers were Muslims
The September 11th 2001 Airline Hijackers were Muslims
The 1993 World Trade Center bombers were Muslims

Think of it:
Buddhists living with Hindus = No Problem
Hindus living with Christians = No Problem
Hindus living with Jews = No Problem
Christians living with Shintos = No Problem
Shintos living with Confucians = No Problem
Confusians living with Baha’is = No Problem
Baha’is living with Jews = No Problem
Jews living with Atheists = No Problem
Atheists living with Buddhists = No Problem
Buddhists living with Sikhs = No Problem
Sikhs living with Hindus = No Problem
Hindus living with Baha’is = No Problem
Baha’is living with Christians = No Problem
Christians living with Jews = No Problem
Jews living with Buddhists = No Problem
Buddhists living with Shintos = No Problem
Shintos living with Atheists = No Problem
Atheists living with Confucians = No Problem
Confusians living with Hindus = No Problem
Muslims living with Hindus = Problem
Muslims living with Buddhists = Problem
Muslims living with Christians = Problem
Muslims living with Jews = Problem
Muslims living with Sikhs = Problem
Muslims living with Baha’is = Problem
Muslims living with Shintos = Problem
Muslims living with Atheists = Problem
MUSLIMS LIVING WITH MUSLIMS = BIG PROBLEM

**********SO THIS LEADS TO *****************
They’re not happy in Gaza
They’re not happy in Egypt
They’re not happy in Libya
They’re not happy in Morocco
They’re not happy in Iran
They’re not happy in Iraq
They’re not happy in Yemen
They’re not happy in Afghanistan
They’re not happy in Pakistan
They’re not happy in Syria
They’re not happy in Lebanon
They’re not happy in Nigeria
They’re not happy in Kenya
They’re not happy in Sudan

******** So, where are they happy? **********
They’re happy in Australia
They’re happy in England
They’re happy in Belgium
They’re happy in France
They’re happy in Italy
They’re happy in Germany
They’re happy in Sweden
They’re happy in the USA & Canada
They’re happy in Norway & India
They’re happy in almost every country that is not Islamic! And who do they blame? Not Islam... Not their leadership... Not themselves... THEY BLAME THE COUNTRIES THEY ARE HAPPY IN!!

And they want to change the countries they’re happy in, to be like the countries they came from where they were unhappy and finally they will get hammered !!!!

Islamic Jihad: AN ISLAMIC TERROR ORGANIZATION
ISIS: AN ISLAMIC TERROR ORGANIZATION
Al-Qaeda: AN ISLAMIC TERROR ORGANIZATION
Taliban: AN ISLAMIC TERROR ORGANIZATION
Hamas: AN ISLAMIC TERROR ORGANIZATION
Hezbollah: AN ISLAMIC TERROR ORGANIZATION
Boko Haram: AN ISLAMIC TERROR ORGANIZATION
Al-Nusra: AN ISLAMIC TERROR ORGANIZATION
Abu Sayyaf: AN ISLAMIC TERROR ORGANIZATION
Al-Badr: AN ISLAMIC TERROR ORGANIZATION
Muslim Brotherhood: AN ISLAMIC TERROR ORGANIZATION
Lashkar-e-Taiba: AN ISLAMIC TERROR ORGANIZATION
Palestine Liberation Front: AN ISLAMIC TERROR ORGANIZATION
Ansaru: AN ISLAMIC TERROR ORGANIZATION
Jemaah Islamiyah: AN ISLAMIC TERROR ORGANIZATION
Abdullah Azzam Brigades: AN ISLAMIC TERROR ORGANIZATION
AND A LOT MORE!!!!!!!

“My theory is so they can start using armed drones on “terrorists” in the USA and not expect any push back or legal challenges.”

I too, highly doubt the whole “Hey! Let’s just strap some explosives to our robot and blow the SOB up” was a spontaneous idea. The question was ‘when’ and under what circumstances will it be optimal timing to roll out this ‘new’ domestic police technique of just blowing up the individual in the standoff, and the accompanying ‘judge-jury-executioner’ instant ‘trial’ that it entails. Also worth questioning, if indeed this wasn’t spontaneous, is what sort of situations are being anticipated in the future that require the need to set a legal precedent now? To those who would just blindly accept this without question, discussion, or debate, as another eloquent poster stated “who gives a shit?”, may I suggest a possibility as to why this current administration in control would want to get any challenges out of the way now: just imagine our worst nightmare, worse than terrorist attacks on our nation, of Hillary winning the presidency, and through whatever means declaring the 2A invalid and mandating all gun owners must turn in their firearms. Let’s not kid ourselves, millions of people will go along with it. Millions more will “lose their firearms in a tragic boating accident” and NEVER pick up a firearm again. Then there will be some who refuse to submit to the illegal decree coming from the queen. The explosives laden robot will be a simple solution to the individual holed up in his house taking pot shots at those trying to arrest him. All of the sudden, libtards and the media will no longer be afraid to use the word “terrorist” and will aggressively begin a campaign to label all people who do not submit as terrorists. Just like many on FR are now saying, there will be plenty who say “he’s breaking the law and the robot is saving innocent police lives”.

Yes, I DO think using a robot with explosives CAN be a useful tool in the law enforcement arsenal. Was it appropriate in this situation? I don’t know all the details of the truth of it all, so I’ll refrain from passing judgement. What I DO know, is that I do indeed “give a shit” and think that much further discussion about this technique is needed. Just for starters, would it have been appropriate for the police to have sought out permission from a judge to proceed, much like it is needed to obtain a warrant before busting down a person’s door. The police had over 3 hours to do such, but there most likely is very little, if any, legal precedent in seeking permission to blow up a barricaded and armed individual. In the future, exactly what circumstances will determine when this is appropriate? There’s plenty of questions that need to be answered before this can become any sort of standard operating procedure, and is certainly worthy of debate, IMO.

Well said.

Robots are dehumanizing, cold, mechanical and diffuses operator responsibility to the benefit and empowerment of the state,

For myself, many years ago I saw nuclear warheads mounted on ICBMs as the fulfillment of ‘who can make war with the beast’ ala books of Revelation. A hellish government ‘beast’ that can call down “fire” from heaven in the sight of men.

Today I perceive something very different. Other nations, other governments and even agencies can make war against state controlled nuclear weapons and have done so in the past as detente and those that can afford as much institutionally can oppose such power.

But just who (being individuals or small groups) can battle against a beast system that can silently circle a ‘drone’ plane five miles out above your house and rain down ‘hell fire’ missiles on just you and your little corner of the city block in the ‘sight’ of your unfriendly neighbors watching from their darkened windows.

Who can make war against that?

This is what I see coming one day,

“But just who (being individuals or small groups) can battle against a beast system that can silently circle a ‘drone’ plane five miles out above your house and rain down ‘hell fire’ missiles on just you and your little corner of the city block in the ‘sight’ of your unfriendly neighbors watching from their darkened windows.”

If Hillary gets into office, and I deliberately do not use the word “elected”, I firmly believe she will ban firearms. If there are enough people who refuse to turn them in, and wind up in shooting matches with those sent to round them up, it would not surprise me in the least if the use of hellfire missles launched from drones is approved for use on US soil. Perhaps this is the exact scenario which prompted Obama to issue yet another executive order at the beginning of the month that discusses collateral damage and how to deal with it. If Hillary and the Globalists start using explosives against their enemies on any sort of routine basis, there will be collateral damage, and they now have a plan in effect as to how they will deal with such.

Trump needs to win by a landslide in order to offset the planned epic voter fraud that’s coming. That said, I just can’t shake a very deep ‘feeling’ of dread associated with the coming republican convention. I fear there are those who have plans to unleash an attack which would make all the others seem like child’s play. I’ll be glad when the convention is over!

” . can’t shake a very deep ‘feeling’ of dread associated with the coming republican convention.”

Yeah I hear you, the thought that innocent people alive right now, today, may no longer be after next week and only for the agitation fomented by this evil administration and its kind, its what they want, their hoping for it, to increase their power and authority by it,

Prayer, fasting and more prayer is the only way to defeat them,

If we fight them on their terms they have the system rigged from their lawless decrees, managed mainstream media, internet social memes all the way to Satan’s throne on the Earth, their being more brazen than they’ve ever been,

We need to win this battle in the spirit, it must be fought in the spirit. Satan will get his time but that doesn’t mean he has to get it right now, in our time,

“Their feet are swift to shed blood: Destruction and misery are in their ways: And the way of peace have they not known: There is no fear of God before their eyes.” Romans 3:15-18

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.