Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

The expense of the A-10 is simply killing the Air Force!

Almost any old BS to make it go away!

We are working on a bigger, better new one; the check is in the mail...

1 posted on 07/13/2016 7:37:36 AM PDT by DUMBGRUNT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: DUMBGRUNT

It has reached the point where Air Force Brass can no longer be trusted to design Close Air Support. The Army needs to design, have built and totally control it’s own.


2 posted on 07/13/2016 7:40:07 AM PDT by \/\/ayne (I regret that I have but one subscription cancellation notice to give to my local newspaper.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DUMBGRUNT

My thoughts exactly. This is a smokescreen to get rid of the A-10.


3 posted on 07/13/2016 7:46:50 AM PDT by rcofdayton (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DUMBGRUNT
Super Warthog


4 posted on 07/13/2016 7:47:07 AM PDT by mountn man (The Pleasure You Get From Life, Is Equal To The Attitude You Put Into It)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DUMBGRUNT

A super warthog. They’ll screw it up. Watch em keep the name, then it’ll be covered with hard points for attaching defense contractor pork.


6 posted on 07/13/2016 7:50:09 AM PDT by DesertRhino (Dogs are man's best friend, and moslems hate dogs. Add that up....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DUMBGRUNT
The A-10 works, and it works very well. It scares the hell out of the bad guys.

It's one hell of a close air support platform. I'd hate to see them taken out of service just to satisfy the bureaucrats and the government contractors who want to make billions building the next gen CAP system.

7 posted on 07/13/2016 7:51:17 AM PDT by Kenton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DUMBGRUNT

Any one want to be the requirements include supersonic cruise?


11 posted on 07/13/2016 7:58:14 AM PDT by DugwayDuke ("A man hears what he wants to hear and disregards the rest")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DUMBGRUNT

They could save millions by leaving the A-10 as it is and it will still dominate the battlefield.


16 posted on 07/13/2016 8:01:01 AM PDT by Marko413
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DUMBGRUNT

You can build a fleet of A-10’s for the cost of one F-35.


18 posted on 07/13/2016 8:01:26 AM PDT by lurk (T)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DUMBGRUNT

Hmm...I’m no stranger to the vicissitudes of military procurement so I’ll take a stab at it. What we need is a plane that is supersonic, service ceiling of 100,000 feet, armed with hypersonic air-to-air missiles with a range of 500 miles, the mere piloting of which will guarantee a spotless OER and an immediate promotion to O6. Probably have to leave the gun and the bomb hard points off, though.


22 posted on 07/13/2016 8:11:46 AM PDT by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DUMBGRUNT

Don't forget the Gatling gun.

24 posted on 07/13/2016 8:17:15 AM PDT by Snickering Hound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DUMBGRUNT

25 posted on 07/13/2016 8:17:18 AM PDT by PLMerite (Compromise is Surrender: The Revolution...will not be kind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DUMBGRUNT

~ The original tank killer ~.

 photo dhm2595_zps6b304662.jpg

34 posted on 07/13/2016 8:49:25 AM PDT by SkyDancer ("They Say That Nobody's Perfect But Yet Here I Am")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DUMBGRUNT

I’m sure someone who deals with the A-10 has a list of possible improvements. It is likely that the 80/20 rule applies to that list. You can get 80% of the improvement for 20% of the dollars.

I vote we do a cost analysis and improve the plane we have within financial reason.


38 posted on 07/13/2016 9:16:33 AM PDT by Senator_Blutarski
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DUMBGRUNT

Air Force generals will always opt for bombers and dogfight fighters over close air support because they love the publicity that those planes (and coincidently their pilots) get.

But the A-10 guys love their work of supporting the troops on the ground when they are needed and the troops love them back.

I don’t know if more improvements can be made on the current Warthog, but improvements would probably be more cost efficient than a whole new plane. Not to mention that a new plane would give the AF generals more money to fool around with in their budget.

If it ain’t broke, don’t scrap it. Use it.


42 posted on 07/13/2016 9:23:53 AM PDT by wildbill (If you check behind the shower curtain for a slasher, and find one.... what's your plan?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DUMBGRUNT

I first saw the A-10 as a young LCpl during a Gallant Eagle Exercise in Twentynine Palms in the 80’s. Even though I was a Motor T POG I understood what this aircraft brought to the battle field. There is no other platform that can perform CAS as effectively as the A-10. The AV8B Harrier is pretty damn good but it doesn’t come close to the Warthog.


47 posted on 07/13/2016 9:55:32 AM PDT by sean327 (God created all men equal, then some become Marines!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson